Constitutional Self-Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: A Framework Observed in 85 Days of Production

As organizations deploy autonomous AI agent systems, a critical governance gap has emerged. Current approaches govern agent permissions — identity, access control, audit logging — but not agent behavior. We term this the "WHO vs. HOW" gap. This paper presents Constitutional Self-Governance (CSG), a framework that constrains autonomous agent decisions through 12 interlocking mechanisms organized into structural, operational, and evolutionary tiers. The framework has been observed in continuous production for 85 days with 48 registered agents, 60 constitutional amendments, three P0 incidents self-resolved, and less than 30 minutes of daily human oversight. The system reports its own failures honestly — currently operating in FREEZE state ($0 revenue) rather than fabricating success metrics. Aligns with EU AI Act (August 2026), NIST AI Agent Standards, Singapore Model AI Governance Framework, and OWASP ASI Top 10 (8/10 compliance). Companion to the Decision Load Index preprint (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18217577). v1.3.0 (2026-09-05): production metrics updated from Day 77 to Day 85 (48 registered agents after registry consolidation); adds structured harness validation of OWASP ASI compliance. Supersedes v1.2.1 (2026-03-22), which reported the 77-day window with 56 agents and remains the correct citation for that window.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19162103
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Constitutional Self-Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: A Framework Observed in 85 Days of Production

Michael K. Saleme
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
preprint

Constitutional Self-Governance for Autonomous AI Agents: A Framework Observed in 85 Days of Production

Michael K. Saleme
preprint en

Abstract

As organizations deploy autonomous AI agent systems, a critical governance gap has emerged. Current approaches govern agent permissions — identity, access control, audit logging — but not agent behavior. We term this the "WHO vs. HOW" gap. This paper presents Constitutional Self-Governance (CSG), a framework that constrains autonomous agent decisions through 12 interlocking mechanisms organized into structural, operational, and evolutionary tiers. The framework has been observed in continuous production for 85 days with 48 registered agents, 60 constitutional amendments, three P0 incidents self-resolved, and less than 30 minutes of daily human oversight. The system reports its own failures honestly — currently operating in FREEZE state ($0 revenue) rather than fabricating success metrics. Aligns with EU AI Act (August 2026), NIST AI Agent Standards, Singapore Model AI Governance Framework, and OWASP ASI Top 10 (8/10 compliance). Companion to the Decision Load Index preprint (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18217577). v1.3.0 (2026-09-05): production metrics updated from Day 77 to Day 85 (48 registered agents after registry consolidation); adds structured harness validation of OWASP ASI compliance. Supersedes v1.2.1 (2026-03-22), which reported the 77-day window with 56 agents and remains the correct citation for that window.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.