Food waste minimisation via dairy date and storage labelling: A comparative review of regulations and industry guidance across five countries

Food waste (FW) is a global concern. Dairy products, including milk, cheese, and yoghurt are consistently identified as high-impact contributors to FW across high-income countries. In Australia, these products are significant contributors to landfill waste within the consumption sector. Evidence suggests that consumer confusion over labelling conventions, particularly storage communications, directions for use, and date marking, contributes to unnecessary disposal of dairy products. This review examined Australian regulations and industry and non-profit guidance for storage communications and date labelling of dairy products with respect to FW minimisation, and compared these frameworks with those in New Zealand, the European Union, United Kingdom, and the United States. Across all jurisdictions, labelling standards primarily aim to ensure food safety and product suitability, with FW reduction largely outside the scope of regulatory bodies. This reflects a broader tension between protecting consumers from potential food safety risks and encouraging practices that minimise FW. Although industry and non-profit bodies frequently provide supplementary guidance intended to support FW reduction, this advice is often inconsistent, limited in scope, and non-binding. While some initiatives, such as WRAP in the United Kingdom, offer more comprehensive models, responsibility for leading such harmonisation efforts remains unclear. Findings highlight the need for clear and consistent storage and date-labelling information to reduce consumer confusion and avoidable dairy waste. Clarifying the roles of regulatory, industry and non-profit stakeholders, and integrating FW mitigation more explicitly into policy and regulatory frameworks, could support more effective and harmonised labelling practices in Australia and internationally. • Storage communications and date labelling conventions may impact food waste. • Food waste considerations are beyond the scope of labelling regulatory bodies. • Inconsistent, unclear, or non-binding labelling guidance contributes to consumer confusion. • Harmonised storage and date labels are vital to cutting avoidable dairy waste. • Roles and responsibility for leading FW-oriented labelling reform is unclear.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Waste Systems
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2026.100506
Primary Topic
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Food waste minimisation via dairy date and storage labelling: A comparative review of regulations and industry guidance across five countries

Hayriye Bozkurt, Jia En Sit, Bryan R. Coad, Helen Morris
Cleaner Waste Systems
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
article

Food waste minimisation via dairy date and storage labelling: A comparative review of regulations and industry guidance across five countries

Hayriye Bozkurt, Jia En Sit, Bryan R. Coad, Helen Morris
article en

Abstract

Food waste (FW) is a global concern. Dairy products, including milk, cheese, and yoghurt are consistently identified as high-impact contributors to FW across high-income countries. In Australia, these products are significant contributors to landfill waste within the consumption sector. Evidence suggests that consumer confusion over labelling conventions, particularly storage communications, directions for use, and date marking, contributes to unnecessary disposal of dairy products. This review examined Australian regulations and industry and non-profit guidance for storage communications and date labelling of dairy products with respect to FW minimisation, and compared these frameworks with those in New Zealand, the European Union, United Kingdom, and the United States. Across all jurisdictions, labelling standards primarily aim to ensure food safety and product suitability, with FW reduction largely outside the scope of regulatory bodies. This reflects a broader tension between protecting consumers from potential food safety risks and encouraging practices that minimise FW. Although industry and non-profit bodies frequently provide supplementary guidance intended to support FW reduction, this advice is often inconsistent, limited in scope, and non-binding. While some initiatives, such as WRAP in the United Kingdom, offer more comprehensive models, responsibility for leading such harmonisation efforts remains unclear. Findings highlight the need for clear and consistent storage and date-labelling information to reduce consumer confusion and avoidable dairy waste. Clarifying the roles of regulatory, industry and non-profit stakeholders, and integrating FW mitigation more explicitly into policy and regulatory frameworks, could support more effective and harmonised labelling practices in Australia and internationally. • Storage communications and date labelling conventions may impact food waste. • Food waste considerations are beyond the scope of labelling regulatory bodies. • Inconsistent, unclear, or non-binding labelling guidance contributes to consumer confusion. • Harmonised storage and date labels are vital to cutting avoidable dairy waste. • Roles and responsibility for leading FW-oriented labelling reform is unclear.

Cleaner Waste SystemsVol. 14
Wine Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.