Differential diagnosis of benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma presenting as lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid nodules based on multiscale CT radiomics

Based on multiscale computed tomography (CT) radiomics, a better model was established to differentially diagnose benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma of Lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid lung nodules. The retrospective study included 178 patients with solid pulmonary nodules were assigned to the training dataset (n = 124) and the testing dataset (n = 54). Gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) was used to reduce the dimensionality of data and select the best radiomics features. Four models were developed by logistic regression method, namely the clinical and imaging model (CIM), the plain CT radiomics model (PRM), the enhanced CT radiomics model (ERM), and the combined model (CM). Area under the curve (AUC) evaluates the model performance. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination index (IDI) were calculated to compare the performance of different models to determine the best model. In the training dataset, the AUC of CIM, PRM, ERM, and CM were 0.795, 0.791, 0.828, and 0.888. The continuous NRI and IDI of CM was better than that of CIM, PRM, ERM (P < 0.001), CM is optimal. In the testing dataset, the AUC of CIM, PRM, ERM and CM were 0.810, 0.689, 0.864 and 0.881. The continuous NRI of CM was better than that of CIM, PRM, ERM (P < 0.050). The IDI of CM was better than that of CIM and PRM (P < 0.050). The AUC values of the Mayo Clinic (Mayo) model, Veterans Administration (VA) model, Peking University People’s Hospital (PKUPH) model and United Imaging Artificial Intelligence (UI AI) model were 0.419, 0.410, 0.676 and 0.675, CM is still optimal. Radiomics can be used as a non-invasive tool to distinguish between benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma of Lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid lung nodules, and CM is the best predictive model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-026-15883-w
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential diagnosis of benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma presenting as lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid nodules based on multiscale CT radiomics

Siyu Che, Dongxue Qin, Yifan He, Jiayue Xie et al.
BMC Cancer
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
article

Differential diagnosis of benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma presenting as lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid nodules based on multiscale CT radiomics

Siyu Che, Dongxue Qin, Yifan He, Jiayue Xie, Shuai Hu, Yuxin Niu, Zhiyong Li, Junjie Li
article en

Abstract

Based on multiscale computed tomography (CT) radiomics, a better model was established to differentially diagnose benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma of Lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid lung nodules. The retrospective study included 178 patients with solid pulmonary nodules were assigned to the training dataset (n = 124) and the testing dataset (n = 54). Gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) was used to reduce the dimensionality of data and select the best radiomics features. Four models were developed by logistic regression method, namely the clinical and imaging model (CIM), the plain CT radiomics model (PRM), the enhanced CT radiomics model (ERM), and the combined model (CM). Area under the curve (AUC) evaluates the model performance. Net reclassification improvement (NRI) and the integrated discrimination index (IDI) were calculated to compare the performance of different models to determine the best model. In the training dataset, the AUC of CIM, PRM, ERM, and CM were 0.795, 0.791, 0.828, and 0.888. The continuous NRI and IDI of CM was better than that of CIM, PRM, ERM (P < 0.001), CM is optimal. In the testing dataset, the AUC of CIM, PRM, ERM and CM were 0.810, 0.689, 0.864 and 0.881. The continuous NRI of CM was better than that of CIM, PRM, ERM (P < 0.050). The IDI of CM was better than that of CIM and PRM (P < 0.050). The AUC values of the Mayo Clinic (Mayo) model, Veterans Administration (VA) model, Peking University People’s Hospital (PKUPH) model and United Imaging Artificial Intelligence (UI AI) model were 0.419, 0.410, 0.676 and 0.675, CM is still optimal. Radiomics can be used as a non-invasive tool to distinguish between benign lesions and lung adenocarcinoma of Lung-RADS 2022 category 4B solid lung nodules, and CM is the best predictive model.

BMC Cancer
Dalian Medical University (CN), Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (CN), First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.