D-dimer and its derivative indicators in gallbladder cancer

Abstract Background The majority of gallbladder cancers (GBCs) are discovered incidentally during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease or upon routine postoperative pathological examination. Identifying simple and effective differential diagnostic markers for GBC is of great importance for primary care physicians and health screening practitioners. Methods This study included 151 patients diagnosed with GBC or benign gallbladder disease (BGD). Preoperative routine blood tests, biochemical parameters, and D-dimer levels were retrospectively reviewed. Relevant laboratory indices were analyzed and compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative power. Results Levels of D-dimer and its derivative indicators, such as monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio × D-dimer (MLRD), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio × D-dimer (NLRD), D-dimer-to-platelet ratio, the systemic immune-inflammation index × D-dimer (SIID), were significantly elevated in the GBC patients compared with the BGD patients (all P < 0.0001). The combination of D-dimer and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio demonstrated strong discriminatory efficacy, achieving an AUC of 0.846, with 80.00% sensitivity and 79.21% specificity ( P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the model combining MLRD, NLR, and SIID yielded an AUC of 0.752 ( P = 0.0003) for discriminating the early-stage from advanced-stage GBC, with a specificity of 92.86%. Conclusion D-dimer and its derivative indicators may possess independent diagnostic value in distinguishing GBC from BGD. The combination of MLRD, NLR and SIID may aid in differentiating between early-stage and advanced-stage GBC. These indicators represent a potentially simple and valuable preoperative screening tool, particularly for early GBC detection. These preliminary findings warrant confirmation in prospective studies with larger sample sizes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04294-z
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

D-dimer and its derivative indicators in gallbladder cancer

Teng-Xiao Wu, Shao-Hua Li, Xu-Fei Song, Jia-Yi Wang
European journal of medical research
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

D-dimer and its derivative indicators in gallbladder cancer

Teng-Xiao Wu, Shao-Hua Li, Xu-Fei Song, Jia-Yi Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The majority of gallbladder cancers (GBCs) are discovered incidentally during cholecystectomy for gallstone disease or upon routine postoperative pathological examination. Identifying simple and effective differential diagnostic markers for GBC is of great importance for primary care physicians and health screening practitioners. Methods This study included 151 patients diagnosed with GBC or benign gallbladder disease (BGD). Preoperative routine blood tests, biochemical parameters, and D-dimer levels were retrospectively reviewed. Relevant laboratory indices were analyzed and compared. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to evaluate the discriminative power. Results Levels of D-dimer and its derivative indicators, such as monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio × D-dimer (MLRD), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio × D-dimer (NLRD), D-dimer-to-platelet ratio, the systemic immune-inflammation index × D-dimer (SIID), were significantly elevated in the GBC patients compared with the BGD patients (all P < 0.0001). The combination of D-dimer and C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio demonstrated strong discriminatory efficacy, achieving an AUC of 0.846, with 80.00% sensitivity and 79.21% specificity ( P < 0.0001). Furthermore, the model combining MLRD, NLR, and SIID yielded an AUC of 0.752 ( P = 0.0003) for discriminating the early-stage from advanced-stage GBC, with a specificity of 92.86%. Conclusion D-dimer and its derivative indicators may possess independent diagnostic value in distinguishing GBC from BGD. The combination of MLRD, NLR and SIID may aid in differentiating between early-stage and advanced-stage GBC. These indicators represent a potentially simple and valuable preoperative screening tool, particularly for early GBC detection. These preliminary findings warrant confirmation in prospective studies with larger sample sizes.

European journal of medical research
The Fifth People's Hospital of Anyang (CN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.