Faces and phases of epistemic curiosity in science learning: A longitudinal study

Curiosity is central to children's development, particularly in science learning. This longitudinal study examines how epistemic curiosity, overall and its subtypes I-type and D-type, predicts scientific reasoning and science (physics) knowledge at the start (Grade 1) and end (Grades 3-4) of primary school, beyond prior knowledge and cognitive abilities. Parents of 122 children (mean age 6.12 years) completed an 11-item curiosity questionnaire. Scientific reasoning and science knowledge were assessed with standardized inventories and a 25-item physics test. Overall curiosity predicted early reasoning, whereas I-type curiosity predicted later science knowledge. These findings highlight that curiosity has distinct faces and phases: I-type and D-type operate differently at different developmental time points. Fostering both types supports multiple aspects of science competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.70041
Primary Topic
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Faces and phases of epistemic curiosity in science learning: A longitudinal study

Susanne Koerber, Christopher Osterhaus
British Journal of Developmental Psychology
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
article

Faces and phases of epistemic curiosity in science learning: A longitudinal study

Susanne Koerber, Christopher Osterhaus
article en

Abstract

Curiosity is central to children's development, particularly in science learning. This longitudinal study examines how epistemic curiosity, overall and its subtypes I-type and D-type, predicts scientific reasoning and science (physics) knowledge at the start (Grade 1) and end (Grades 3-4) of primary school, beyond prior knowledge and cognitive abilities. Parents of 122 children (mean age 6.12 years) completed an 11-item curiosity questionnaire. Scientific reasoning and science knowledge were assessed with standardized inventories and a 25-item physics test. Overall curiosity predicted early reasoning, whereas I-type curiosity predicted later science knowledge. These findings highlight that curiosity has distinct faces and phases: I-type and D-type operate differently at different developmental time points. Fostering both types supports multiple aspects of science competence.

British Journal of Developmental Psychology
University of Vechta (DE), University of Education Freiburg (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Psychological and Educational Research Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Faces and phases of epistemic curiosity in science learning: A longitudinal study — Susanne Koerber, Christopher Osterhaus · British Journal of Developmental Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS