Successor System Formation: A Structural Account of Emergent Admissible Systems After Collapse

This paper introduces Successor System Formation within the Paton System as a structural account of how new admissible systems emerge following collapse. Building on Post-Collapse Dynamics System Re-Entry and Terminal Collapse the framework defines successor formation as the emergence of a new admissible configuration from post-collapse fragments that does not preserve sufficient structural continuity to qualify as restoration of the original system. The paper formalises transformation as a distinct outcome within the admissibility lifecycle. It distinguishes successor formation from re-entry and terminal collapse and establishes transformation as a structural pathway arising from fragmentation recombination and constraint resolution in a new configuration. This provides a domain independent method for analysing how new systems arise from breakdown without modifying underlying governing equations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19159362
Primary Topic
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Successor System Formation: A Structural Account of Emergent Admissible Systems After Collapse

Andrew John Paton
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
article

Successor System Formation: A Structural Account of Emergent Admissible Systems After Collapse

Andrew John Paton
article en

Abstract

This paper introduces Successor System Formation within the Paton System as a structural account of how new admissible systems emerge following collapse. Building on Post-Collapse Dynamics System Re-Entry and Terminal Collapse the framework defines successor formation as the emergence of a new admissible configuration from post-collapse fragments that does not preserve sufficient structural continuity to qualify as restoration of the original system. The paper formalises transformation as a distinct outcome within the admissibility lifecycle. It distinguishes successor formation from re-entry and terminal collapse and establishes transformation as a structural pathway arising from fragmentation recombination and constraint resolution in a new configuration. This provides a domain independent method for analysing how new systems arise from breakdown without modifying underlying governing equations.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.