Algorithmic Management in the Platform Work Directive: Fixing the GDPR?

The Platform Work Directive (PWD) was adopted at the end of 2024. It contains a chapter on algorithmic management, covering topics which were already regulated by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). However, the GDPR is said to lack practical effectiveness when applied in the employment context, which made it necessary that new, more specific legislation was adopted. In this paper, I consider the question to what extent the PWD is better positioned than the GDPR to address employment issues in light of the worker’s right to data protection. I study the four topics which are regulated or touched upon in the algorithmic management chapter of the PWD, namely limits to data processing, automated decision-making, transparency, and Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs). For each topic, I describe how both the GDPR and the PWD regulate them, and what level of protection for the worker’s right to data protection they offer. I conclude that the PWD generally constitutes an improvement for the worker’s right to data protection, as it complements and clarifies multiple issues raised by the GDPR in the context of employment. On the other hand, some issues and unclarities remain to exist, mostly looking at the legal ground for data processing requirement and transparency.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2026002
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Management in the Platform Work Directive: Fixing the GDPR?

Anne Joppe
International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Algorithmic Management in the Platform Work Directive: Fixing the GDPR?

Anne Joppe
article en

Abstract

The Platform Work Directive (PWD) was adopted at the end of 2024. It contains a chapter on algorithmic management, covering topics which were already regulated by the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). However, the GDPR is said to lack practical effectiveness when applied in the employment context, which made it necessary that new, more specific legislation was adopted. In this paper, I consider the question to what extent the PWD is better positioned than the GDPR to address employment issues in light of the worker’s right to data protection. I study the four topics which are regulated or touched upon in the algorithmic management chapter of the PWD, namely limits to data processing, automated decision-making, transparency, and Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs). For each topic, I describe how both the GDPR and the PWD regulate them, and what level of protection for the worker’s right to data protection they offer. I conclude that the PWD generally constitutes an improvement for the worker’s right to data protection, as it complements and clarifies multiple issues raised by the GDPR in the context of employment. On the other hand, some issues and unclarities remain to exist, mostly looking at the legal ground for data processing requirement and transparency.

International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial RelationsVol. 41(Issue 3/4)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.