Between the state and the streets: Parainstitutional authority and neighbourhood social control in street outreach work

Abstract Research on street outreach emphasizes evaluations of violence reduction outcomes; however, few studies examine how workers impact social control in marginalized neighbourhoods. Drawing on ethnographic observations and interviews with street outreach workers in a post-industrial city in the Northeastern United States, this study explores how these actors exercise parainstitutional control—a fourth level beyond private, parochial, and public forms. Outreach workers deploy credibility-based authority to regulate public space, activate collective efficacy, and bridge institutional boundaries. Yet this control is constrained by contingent legitimacy and institutional precarity. Findings demonstrate that while outreach workers provide regulatory functions unavailable to police, these practices operate within fragile institutional contexts, raising important questions about how credibility-based authority is supported within urban public safety systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Criminology
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azag022
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between the state and the streets: Parainstitutional authority and neighbourhood social control in street outreach work

Brian Wade
The British Journal of Criminology
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Between the state and the streets: Parainstitutional authority and neighbourhood social control in street outreach work

Brian Wade
article en

Abstract

Abstract Research on street outreach emphasizes evaluations of violence reduction outcomes; however, few studies examine how workers impact social control in marginalized neighbourhoods. Drawing on ethnographic observations and interviews with street outreach workers in a post-industrial city in the Northeastern United States, this study explores how these actors exercise parainstitutional control—a fourth level beyond private, parochial, and public forms. Outreach workers deploy credibility-based authority to regulate public space, activate collective efficacy, and bridge institutional boundaries. Yet this control is constrained by contingent legitimacy and institutional precarity. Findings demonstrate that while outreach workers provide regulatory functions unavailable to police, these practices operate within fragile institutional contexts, raising important questions about how credibility-based authority is supported within urban public safety systems.

The British Journal of Criminology
Institute of Criminology (SI), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.