Comparative Analysis and Legality of Anti-poaching Agreements in the Indian Context

Anti-poaching and wage-fixing agreements in labour markets represent a significant, yet largely unaddressed, antitrust concern in India. This paper argues that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) possesses both the legislative mandate under the Competition Act, 2002, and a compelling jurisprudential basis to proactively investigate and penalise such collusive practices. Drawing on a comparative analysis of enforcement trends in jurisdictions like the US, EU, and Canada, and a doctrinal review of Indian contract and competition law, this paper contends that the CCI’s current reluctance to engage with these issues, often deferring them to employment law, is a critical lacuna. It demonstrates that existing provisions, particularly section 3 of the Competition Act, are sufficient to address these anti-competitive agreements. The paper concludes by offering specific policy and enforcement recommendations for the CCI, urging a shift towards robust scrutiny to safeguard labour mobility, to ensure fair wages, and promote overall economic efficiency in India’s rapidly evolving labour markets.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/ijcl2025016
Primary Topic
Labor Movements and Unions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Analysis and Legality of Anti-poaching Agreements in the Indian Context

Maryam Ishrat Beg, Adhip Narayan Banerjee
International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations
Labor Movements and Unions
article

Comparative Analysis and Legality of Anti-poaching Agreements in the Indian Context

Maryam Ishrat Beg, Adhip Narayan Banerjee
article en

Abstract

Anti-poaching and wage-fixing agreements in labour markets represent a significant, yet largely unaddressed, antitrust concern in India. This paper argues that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) possesses both the legislative mandate under the Competition Act, 2002, and a compelling jurisprudential basis to proactively investigate and penalise such collusive practices. Drawing on a comparative analysis of enforcement trends in jurisdictions like the US, EU, and Canada, and a doctrinal review of Indian contract and competition law, this paper contends that the CCI’s current reluctance to engage with these issues, often deferring them to employment law, is a critical lacuna. It demonstrates that existing provisions, particularly section 3 of the Competition Act, are sufficient to address these anti-competitive agreements. The paper concludes by offering specific policy and enforcement recommendations for the CCI, urging a shift towards robust scrutiny to safeguard labour mobility, to ensure fair wages, and promote overall economic efficiency in India’s rapidly evolving labour markets.

International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial RelationsVol. 41(Issue 3/4)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Labor Movements and Unions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.