The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment including clinical feedback in progressed bipolar disorder: the SmartBipolar trial randomised controlled parallel-group trial

A substantial proportion of patients with bipolar disorder experience daily variability in mood that seems associated with poor prognostic factors, including impaired functioning, and increased risk of hospitalisation and relapse. The present SmartBipolar randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether group (1) daily smartphone-based outpatient monitoring and treatment including CBT elements with clinical feedback (intervention group) versus group (2) daily smartphone-based monitoring and treatment with CBT elements without clinical feedback (content was the same as intervention group but without clinical feedback) (control group) or group (3) daily smartphone-based mood monitoring only without CBT elements or other smartphone content (control group), improved mood instability and other clinically relevant patient-related outcomes in patients who have had a bipolar disorder for more than two years, and typically many years. This study was a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with a follow-up period of 6 months. The outcomes were (1) mood instability (primary), (2) questionnaire-based evaluations of quality of life, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms, perceived stress, as well as smartphone-based measures of mood, activity, stress, anxiety, irritability, and sleep. Group differences were quantified using linear mixed models. A total of 201 patients with progressed bipolar disorder were included as part of their specialised outpatient treatment in the Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. The trial began in March 2021 with last patient follow-up in July 2025. Intention-to-treat analyses showed no differences in the primary outcome mood instability (difference: 0, 95%CI: -0.16; 0.16, p = 0.98). In addition, there were no differences in other patient-reported outcome measures. This was an unblinded trial. There was no positive or negative effects of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment on primary or secondary outcomes in the present trial. NCT04230421. Registered January, 2020.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
Published
2026-03-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40345-026-00418-w
Primary Topic
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment including clinical feedback in progressed bipolar disorder: the SmartBipolar trial randomised controlled parallel-group trial

Ulla Knorr, Ellen Margrethe Christensen, Jens Drachmann Bukh, Henrik Nørbak-Emig et al.
International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
article

The effect of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment including clinical feedback in progressed bipolar disorder: the SmartBipolar trial randomised controlled parallel-group trial

Ulla Knorr, Ellen Margrethe Christensen, Jens Drachmann Bukh, Henrik Nørbak-Emig, Darius Mardosas, Natacha Blauenfeldt Kyster, Nanna Iversen, Birte Smidt, Anja Mathiesen, Lotte Linnemann Sponsor, Malene Schwarz Dyreholt, Kim Brøndmark, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Trine Vøgg Heller, Esben Budtz-Jørgensen, L. V. Kessing, Rene Sjaelland, Denis Cululejevic, Maj Vinberg, Asbjørn Risom
article en

Abstract

A substantial proportion of patients with bipolar disorder experience daily variability in mood that seems associated with poor prognostic factors, including impaired functioning, and increased risk of hospitalisation and relapse. The present SmartBipolar randomised controlled trial (RCT) investigated whether group (1) daily smartphone-based outpatient monitoring and treatment including CBT elements with clinical feedback (intervention group) versus group (2) daily smartphone-based monitoring and treatment with CBT elements without clinical feedback (content was the same as intervention group but without clinical feedback) (control group) or group (3) daily smartphone-based mood monitoring only without CBT elements or other smartphone content (control group), improved mood instability and other clinically relevant patient-related outcomes in patients who have had a bipolar disorder for more than two years, and typically many years. This study was a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial with a follow-up period of 6 months. The outcomes were (1) mood instability (primary), (2) questionnaire-based evaluations of quality of life, depressive symptoms, manic symptoms, perceived stress, as well as smartphone-based measures of mood, activity, stress, anxiety, irritability, and sleep. Group differences were quantified using linear mixed models. A total of 201 patients with progressed bipolar disorder were included as part of their specialised outpatient treatment in the Mental Health Services in the Capital Region of Denmark. The trial began in March 2021 with last patient follow-up in July 2025. Intention-to-treat analyses showed no differences in the primary outcome mood instability (difference: 0, 95%CI: -0.16; 0.16, p = 0.98). In addition, there were no differences in other patient-reported outcome measures. This was an unblinded trial. There was no positive or negative effects of smartphone-based monitoring and treatment on primary or secondary outcomes in the present trial. NCT04230421. Registered January, 2020.

International Journal of Bipolar Disorders
University of Copenhagen (DK), Copenhagen Business School (DK), Region Zealand (DK), Mental Health Services (DK), Amager Hospital (DK), Frederiksberg Hospital (DK), Glostrup Hospital (DK), Psychiatry Region Zealand (DK), Center for Clinical & Basic Research (DK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.