Assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia in children: a comparative study of the Arabic version of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool and fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing

Abstract Background While instrumental assessments like fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) are the definitive methods for diagnosing pediatric oropharyngeal dysphagia, caregiver-reported screening tools are essential for early triage. This study aimed to determine the direct predictive value of the Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic against specific FEES findings in children aged 6 months to 4 years. In a cross-sectional study, 52 children with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia were evaluated. Caregivers completed the Pedi-EAT-10Arabic as a proxy report. FEES was performed by a specialized team using a standardized protocol with dyed boluses of varying consistencies (liquid, puree, and soft solids). Statistical analysis, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, was used to correlate Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic scores with four FEES parameters: premature spillage, pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration. Results The mean Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic score was 17.94 ± 9.67. FEES revealed high rates of laryngeal penetration (76.9%) and aspiration (75.0%), frequently occurring as co-occurring signs, while pharyngeal residue (17.3%) and premature spillage (15.4%) were less frequent. Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic scores were significantly associated with all FEES findings, showing the highest predictive accuracy for laryngeal penetration (AUC = 0.976) and aspiration (AUC = 0.995). A cutoff score of ≥ 13 demonstrated excellent discriminative ability for these safety risks. Conclusions The Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic is a potent predictor of pharyngeal-phase safety risks, particularly aspiration and penetration. While it does not replace instrumental evaluation for defining pathophysiology, its high sensitivity makes it a reliable triage tool for prioritizing children for urgent instrumental assessment and optimizing clinical resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2026-03-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-026-01060-0
Primary Topic
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia in children: a comparative study of the Arabic version of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool and fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing

Mona Sameeh Khodeir, Sabah Mohammed Hassan, Salwa Ahmed Abd Elhay, Fatma Elsayed Abo Elfotoh
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
article

Assessing oropharyngeal dysphagia in children: a comparative study of the Arabic version of the Pediatric Eating Assessment Tool and fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing

Mona Sameeh Khodeir, Sabah Mohammed Hassan, Salwa Ahmed Abd Elhay, Fatma Elsayed Abo Elfotoh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background While instrumental assessments like fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) are the definitive methods for diagnosing pediatric oropharyngeal dysphagia, caregiver-reported screening tools are essential for early triage. This study aimed to determine the direct predictive value of the Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic against specific FEES findings in children aged 6 months to 4 years. In a cross-sectional study, 52 children with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia were evaluated. Caregivers completed the Pedi-EAT-10Arabic as a proxy report. FEES was performed by a specialized team using a standardized protocol with dyed boluses of varying consistencies (liquid, puree, and soft solids). Statistical analysis, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, was used to correlate Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic scores with four FEES parameters: premature spillage, pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration. Results The mean Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic score was 17.94 ± 9.67. FEES revealed high rates of laryngeal penetration (76.9%) and aspiration (75.0%), frequently occurring as co-occurring signs, while pharyngeal residue (17.3%) and premature spillage (15.4%) were less frequent. Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic scores were significantly associated with all FEES findings, showing the highest predictive accuracy for laryngeal penetration (AUC = 0.976) and aspiration (AUC = 0.995). A cutoff score of ≥ 13 demonstrated excellent discriminative ability for these safety risks. Conclusions The Pedi-EAT-10 Arabic is a potent predictor of pharyngeal-phase safety risks, particularly aspiration and penetration. While it does not replace instrumental evaluation for defining pathophysiology, its high sensitivity makes it a reliable triage tool for prioritizing children for urgent instrumental assessment and optimizing clinical resource allocation.

The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 42(1)
Ain Shams University (EG), Benha University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dysphagia Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.