Beyond Efficiency: A Bibliometric Review of Public Values in Digital Public–Private Partnership Research

ABSTRACT Digital public–private partnerships have become an increasingly prominent mechanism for delivering digitally mediated public services and infrastructures. Despite rapid growth in this literature, limited attention has been given to how public values are conceptually structured and evaluated. This study addresses this gap through a systematic bibliometric review of Scopus‐indexed journal articles published between 2000 and 2025. Using performance analysis and science‐mapping techniques, including keyword co‐occurrence, thematic mapping, and bibliographic coupling, the study examines the conceptual and intellectual configuration of digital public–private partnership research. The findings reveal a field characterized by thematic expansion but uneven theoretical development. Managerial and performance‐oriented concepts occupy central positions, while democratic values such as equity, accountability, and participation remain weakly integrated. Intellectual foundations continue to rely heavily on infrastructure‐era partnership frameworks, indicating path‐dependent use of analytical models that are not fully aligned with the governance challenges of digital systems. The study advances theoretical understanding by identifying structural mechanisms that shape evaluative priorities and by highlighting the need to integrate public value governance and digital governance perspectives to strengthen normative analysis in digitally mediated hybrid arrangements.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Administration and Development
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70072
Primary Topic
Public-Private Partnership Projects
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Efficiency: A Bibliometric Review of Public Values in Digital Public–Private Partnership Research

Bora Ly, Romny Ly, Sokhom Ma
Public Administration and Development
Public-Private Partnership Projects
article

Beyond Efficiency: A Bibliometric Review of Public Values in Digital Public–Private Partnership Research

Bora Ly, Romny Ly, Sokhom Ma
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Digital public–private partnerships have become an increasingly prominent mechanism for delivering digitally mediated public services and infrastructures. Despite rapid growth in this literature, limited attention has been given to how public values are conceptually structured and evaluated. This study addresses this gap through a systematic bibliometric review of Scopus‐indexed journal articles published between 2000 and 2025. Using performance analysis and science‐mapping techniques, including keyword co‐occurrence, thematic mapping, and bibliographic coupling, the study examines the conceptual and intellectual configuration of digital public–private partnership research. The findings reveal a field characterized by thematic expansion but uneven theoretical development. Managerial and performance‐oriented concepts occupy central positions, while democratic values such as equity, accountability, and participation remain weakly integrated. Intellectual foundations continue to rely heavily on infrastructure‐era partnership frameworks, indicating path‐dependent use of analytical models that are not fully aligned with the governance challenges of digital systems. The study advances theoretical understanding by identifying structural mechanisms that shape evaluative priorities and by highlighting the need to integrate public value governance and digital governance perspectives to strengthen normative analysis in digitally mediated hybrid arrangements.

Public Administration and Development
University of Cambodia (KH), Cambodia-Oxford Medical Research Unit (KH), Cambodian Mekong University (KH)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Public-Private Partnership Projects
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.