Technico-economic evaluation of membrane processes (ED, NF, and RO) in the defluoridation of Moroccan groundwater: Benguerire case
ABSTRACT This study evaluates the performance of electrodialysis (ED) using the CMX/ACS membrane pair, nanofiltration (NF) with the NF90 or NF270 membranes, and reverse osmosis (RO) with the BW30 membrane for fluoride removal in groundwater from Ben Guerir. This region is characterized by a salinity of 1.2 g/L and a fluoride concentration of 2.32 ppm. The results indicate that ED achieved good water quality with a demineralization rate of 40% at a cost of 0.2275 AMD/m3. NF using the NF270 membrane produced water of acceptable quality for a cost of 0.1033 AMD/m3. In contrast, both RO with the BW30 membrane and NF with the NF90 membrane yielded water with a highly aggressive chemical profile, necessitating remineralization. Remineralization, achieved by adding filtered water, reduced the cost to 0.0650 AMD/m3 for the NF90 membrane and 0.0658 AMD/m3 for the BW30 membrane, whereas remineralization using lime resulted in costs of 0.126 AMD/m3 for NF90 and 0.1343 AMD/m3 for BW30. In conclusion, the findings suggest that the most efficient and cost-effective solution for fluoride removal in this context is either NF using the NF90 membrane or RO with the BW30 membrane, combined with remineralization by adding filtered water.
Authors
- Fatima Elazhar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1291-4161)
- Fatima Zahra Addar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6086-1877)
- M. Taky
- Abdellah El Attar
- Soufian El-Ghzizel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-3108)
- Mustapha Tahaikt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3008-1708)
Institutions
- Université Ibn-Tofail (MA)
- Université Sultan Moulay Slimane (MA)
- Université Mohammed VI Polytechnique (MA)
- Université Moulay Ismail de Meknes (MA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Water Practice & Technology
- Published
- 2026-03-13
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2166/wpt.2026.238
- Primary Topic
- Fluoride Effects and Removal
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00