Towards a sweetpotato genomic-enabled breeding: optimizing two-stage analysis of multi-environment augmented trials

Using the full weight matrix and deregressed pedigree-based best linear unbiased predictions in second-stage models lead to selections and genomic predictions closer to those obtained using a single-stage model. In multi-environment genomic selection, although single-stage (SS) models are generally more efficient (no loss of information), there are contexts where they are difficult to fit, making two-stage models the most practical alternative. An example is the evaluation of early-stage observational trials (OTs) of sweetpotato breeding, where several clones are tested in unreplicated trials. In this study, 1,138 clones derived from partial diallels within two gene pools had their storage root yield evaluated across six OTs. Using this scenario, we compared the selection and prediction performances of models under different two-stage strategies against the SS benchmark. We also tested whether pool-specific genomic prediction models offered advantages over models trained with the complete dataset. Given the lack of replication in OTs, we hypothesized that deregressed best linear unbiased predictions (dBLUPs) or pedigree-based dBLUPs (dABLUPs) would work more appropriately as inputs for second-stage models than best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs). These comparisons were conducted within weighted models using either a diagonal weight matrix or the full weight matrix. For selection, differences among second-stage models were minor, with a slight advantage for those using dABLUPs as entries, combined with the full weight matrix. For prediction, however, the choice of weighting scheme had a greater impact on performance than the choice of entry. Using the complete dataset, differences between entries were marginal, but for pool-specific predictions, dABLUPs provided the best performance. Overall, if adopting a two-stage strategy for the analysis of augmented trials, we recommend using dABLUPs together with the full weight matrix.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-026-05204-x
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a sweetpotato genomic-enabled breeding: optimizing two-stage analysis of multi-environment augmented trials

Bert De Boeck, Reuben Ssali, Saulo Fabrício da Silva Chaves, José Tiago B. Chagas et al.
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
article

Towards a sweetpotato genomic-enabled breeding: optimizing two-stage analysis of multi-environment augmented trials

Bert De Boeck, Reuben Ssali, Saulo Fabrício da Silva Chaves, José Tiago B. Chagas, Guilherme da Silva Pereira, Kaio Olimpio G. Dias, Thiago Mendes, G. Craig Yencho, Hugo Campos, Hannele Lindqvist-Kreuze
article en

Abstract

Using the full weight matrix and deregressed pedigree-based best linear unbiased predictions in second-stage models lead to selections and genomic predictions closer to those obtained using a single-stage model. In multi-environment genomic selection, although single-stage (SS) models are generally more efficient (no loss of information), there are contexts where they are difficult to fit, making two-stage models the most practical alternative. An example is the evaluation of early-stage observational trials (OTs) of sweetpotato breeding, where several clones are tested in unreplicated trials. In this study, 1,138 clones derived from partial diallels within two gene pools had their storage root yield evaluated across six OTs. Using this scenario, we compared the selection and prediction performances of models under different two-stage strategies against the SS benchmark. We also tested whether pool-specific genomic prediction models offered advantages over models trained with the complete dataset. Given the lack of replication in OTs, we hypothesized that deregressed best linear unbiased predictions (dBLUPs) or pedigree-based dBLUPs (dABLUPs) would work more appropriately as inputs for second-stage models than best linear unbiased estimates (BLUEs). These comparisons were conducted within weighted models using either a diagonal weight matrix or the full weight matrix. For selection, differences among second-stage models were minor, with a slight advantage for those using dABLUPs as entries, combined with the full weight matrix. For prediction, however, the choice of weighting scheme had a greater impact on performance than the choice of entry. Using the complete dataset, differences between entries were marginal, but for pool-specific predictions, dABLUPs provided the best performance. Overall, if adopting a two-stage strategy for the analysis of augmented trials, we recommend using dABLUPs together with the full weight matrix.

Theoretical and Applied GeneticsVol. 139(4)
International Potato Center (PE), North Carolina State University (US), Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), International Potato Center (KE), International Potato Center (UG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.