Digital health interventions for older adults with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment represent critical windows for intervention as early stages of dementia progression. Although digital health interventions have shown potential in enhancing cognitive performance and slowing cognitive decline, their clinical efficacy remains a subject of debate. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of digital health interventions on cognition, emotion, functional ability, and quality of life in older adults with SCD and MCI. We searched five databases for randomized controlled trials published until August 2025. Eligible studies involved adults aged 60 years or older with SCD or MCI receiving a digital health intervention versus usual care or conventional non-digital interventions. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Fifteen trials (N = 829) were included. The meta-analysis showed that digital health interventions significantly improved cognitive function (SMD = 0.387, 95% CI: 0.052–0.723; I2 = 66%) and functional ability (MD = 1.364, 95% CI: 0.937–1.790, I2 = 0.0%). However, no significant effects were observed for emotional status (SMD = -0.192, 95% CI: -0.405–0.021, I2 = 0.0%) or quality of life (MD = -0.660, 95% CI:-2.730–1.409, I2 = 0.0%). The small number of studies limited quantitative synthesis for specific cognitive domains. Digital health interventions had been shown to improve global cognitive function and functional ability in older adults with SCD or MCI, but they did not appear to significantly affect emotional status or quality of life. However, these findings are based on evidence of limited methodological quality, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm these effects and to clarify potential domain-specific cognitive benefits of digital health interventions. Prospero Number: CRD420251155249.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-026-07341-w
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital health interventions for older adults with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Huiping Qiu, le Zhao, Nan Xu, Cui Mao
BMC Geriatrics
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Digital health interventions for older adults with subjective cognitive decline or mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Huiping Qiu, le Zhao, Nan Xu, Cui Mao
article en

Abstract

Subjective cognitive decline and mild cognitive impairment represent critical windows for intervention as early stages of dementia progression. Although digital health interventions have shown potential in enhancing cognitive performance and slowing cognitive decline, their clinical efficacy remains a subject of debate. This review aimed to systematically evaluate the impact of digital health interventions on cognition, emotion, functional ability, and quality of life in older adults with SCD and MCI. We searched five databases for randomized controlled trials published until August 2025. Eligible studies involved adults aged 60 years or older with SCD or MCI receiving a digital health intervention versus usual care or conventional non-digital interventions. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. Fifteen trials (N = 829) were included. The meta-analysis showed that digital health interventions significantly improved cognitive function (SMD = 0.387, 95% CI: 0.052–0.723; I2 = 66%) and functional ability (MD = 1.364, 95% CI: 0.937–1.790, I2 = 0.0%). However, no significant effects were observed for emotional status (SMD = -0.192, 95% CI: -0.405–0.021, I2 = 0.0%) or quality of life (MD = -0.660, 95% CI:-2.730–1.409, I2 = 0.0%). The small number of studies limited quantitative synthesis for specific cognitive domains. Digital health interventions had been shown to improve global cognitive function and functional ability in older adults with SCD or MCI, but they did not appear to significantly affect emotional status or quality of life. However, these findings are based on evidence of limited methodological quality, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Further high-quality clinical trials are needed to confirm these effects and to clarify potential domain-specific cognitive benefits of digital health interventions. Prospero Number: CRD420251155249.

BMC Geriatrics
University of Malaya (MY), Quzhou College of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.