Investing in Carbon Dioxide Removals: A new analytical and policy paradigm

Carbon dioxide removals (CDR) have become central to climate policy. Current policy approaches, however, are insufficient to create the basis for CDR technologies to scale because they are not yet aligned with the complexity shaping the emerging sector. In this article, we provide an approach to understanding the characteristics of CDR which we argue is composed of both market-creation and market-led complexity. Our engagement with market actors since 2020 suggests that we have entered this new paradigm of complexity earlier than was the case for renewables and in a different way due to the nature of demand. We illustrate how these complexity characteristics are not well captured by existing tools that support policymaking. And we provide an alternative approach to the support of decision-making which is both exploratory and participatory in nature. We call for governments to embrace new tools to facilitate engagement between the public and private sector actors in ways that can more directly capture the sector's complexity. Public-private collaborations for the next phase of CDR investment will be needed to allow governments to both guide the sector whilst also providing a backstop to risk for private sector partners. Participatory and dialectic stakeholder deliberation processes should be integrated throughout analysis, policy design and cross-sector approaches rather than being thought of as separate in order to facilitate timely, targeted interventions that are robust to different possible futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104669
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investing in Carbon Dioxide Removals: A new analytical and policy paradigm

Mark Workman, Madison Cuthbertson, Aoife Marie Brophy, Astha Wagle et al.
Energy Research & Social Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Investing in Carbon Dioxide Removals: A new analytical and policy paradigm

Mark Workman, Madison Cuthbertson, Aoife Marie Brophy, Astha Wagle, Jordan Calverley, Lauren McCormack, Edoardo Taricco, Quillan Shaw
article en

Abstract

Carbon dioxide removals (CDR) have become central to climate policy. Current policy approaches, however, are insufficient to create the basis for CDR technologies to scale because they are not yet aligned with the complexity shaping the emerging sector. In this article, we provide an approach to understanding the characteristics of CDR which we argue is composed of both market-creation and market-led complexity. Our engagement with market actors since 2020 suggests that we have entered this new paradigm of complexity earlier than was the case for renewables and in a different way due to the nature of demand. We illustrate how these complexity characteristics are not well captured by existing tools that support policymaking. And we provide an alternative approach to the support of decision-making which is both exploratory and participatory in nature. We call for governments to embrace new tools to facilitate engagement between the public and private sector actors in ways that can more directly capture the sector's complexity. Public-private collaborations for the next phase of CDR investment will be needed to allow governments to both guide the sector whilst also providing a backstop to risk for private sector partners. Participatory and dialectic stakeholder deliberation processes should be integrated throughout analysis, policy design and cross-sector approaches rather than being thought of as separate in order to facilitate timely, targeted interventions that are robust to different possible futures.

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 135
Royal British Legion (GB), Capital Group (United States) (US), University of Oxford (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.