Integrating Precision Sepsis Risk Stratification into Systems-based Antimicrobial Stewardship

Abstract Early broad-spectrum antimicrobial administration in sepsis is strongly associated with improved survival. However, widespread implementation of time-based antibiotic mandates has substantially increased antimicrobial utilization, contributing to escalating global antimicrobial resistance. This creates a fundamental tension in sepsis care: aggressive empiric therapy optimizes short-term outcomes for individual patients but threatens long-term antimicrobial effectiveness at a population level. This perspective frames the “sepsis–antimicrobial stewardship tension” as a systems-level problem driven by diagnostic uncertainty, organizational incentives, and guideline implementation. We review emerging evidence demonstrating heterogeneity in the benefit of early antibiotics and highlight how rigid quality metrics, such as the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services SEP-1 measure, may exacerbate unnecessary antimicrobial use. Finally, we discuss how advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and host-response diagnostics can enable precision risk–guided antimicrobial timing. Integrating these tools into clinical workflows via health systems engineering offers a path towards addressing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofag162
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating Precision Sepsis Risk Stratification into Systems-based Antimicrobial Stewardship

James S. Ford, Gabriel Wardi, Ashim Malhotra, Ben Gross et al.
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Integrating Precision Sepsis Risk Stratification into Systems-based Antimicrobial Stewardship

James S. Ford, Gabriel Wardi, Ashim Malhotra, Ben Gross, Shamim Nemati
article en

Abstract

Abstract Early broad-spectrum antimicrobial administration in sepsis is strongly associated with improved survival. However, widespread implementation of time-based antibiotic mandates has substantially increased antimicrobial utilization, contributing to escalating global antimicrobial resistance. This creates a fundamental tension in sepsis care: aggressive empiric therapy optimizes short-term outcomes for individual patients but threatens long-term antimicrobial effectiveness at a population level. This perspective frames the “sepsis–antimicrobial stewardship tension” as a systems-level problem driven by diagnostic uncertainty, organizational incentives, and guideline implementation. We review emerging evidence demonstrating heterogeneity in the benefit of early antibiotics and highlight how rigid quality metrics, such as the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services SEP-1 measure, may exacerbate unnecessary antimicrobial use. Finally, we discuss how advances in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and host-response diagnostics can enable precision risk–guided antimicrobial timing. Integrating these tools into clinical workflows via health systems engineering offers a path towards addressing antimicrobial resistance.

Open Forum Infectious Diseases
University of San Diego (US), University of California San Diego (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.