Optimizing CAD/CAM ceramics: a comparative study of polishing and glazing effects on surface quality and aesthetic properties following coffee thermocycling

This in vitro study aims to evaluate the effects of two different surface finishing procedures-glazing and polishing-on the stability of colour, the translucency, and the roughness of surface with three CAD/CAM ceramic materials: lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLC), and translucent zirconia (TrZ). The process is evaluated before and after coffee thermocycling. A total of 120 samples (1.0 ± 0.1 mm) were prepared from LDC (IPS e.max CAD HT A2), ZLC (Celtra Duo HT A2), and TrZ (Cercon HT A2). All samples were subjected to standardized grinding for 20 s to simulate chairside adjustments and were then assigned to glaze (G) or polish (P) subgroups (n = 20). Surface roughness (Ra, Rz) was measured by using a contact profilometer, while colour coordinates (L*, a*, b*), colour difference (ΔE₀₀) (∆E00), and translucency parameter (TP) were recorded with a colorimeter. All samples underwent 10,000 coffee thermocycles (5–55 °C). Data were analysed by using one-way ANOVA, repeated-measures ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and appropriate post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). It is seen that grinding produced the highest Ra and Rz values in ZLC, followed by LDC and TrZ. When surface treatments were completed, polished TrZ showed a significantly lower Ra compared with glazed TrZ, while ZLC and LDC exhibited lower roughness after glazing, although not significantly. Only the ZLC-P group demonstrated a perceptible colour change, yet all groups remained within the clinically acceptable threshold (< 2.23). Before and after thermocycling, LDC showed the highest TP values, followed by ZLC and TrZ. Thermocycling significantly increased Ra (except in TrZ-P and ZLC-P) and decreased TP values in all materials except LDC-P. Based on the results, it is concluded that surface finishing techniques and coffee thermocycling affect the optical and surface properties of CAD/CAM ceramics. Glazing generally provides smoother surfaces for glass-ceramics, whereas polishing has superior outcomes for translucent zirconia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Oral Health
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-026-08142-8
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing CAD/CAM ceramics: a comparative study of polishing and glazing effects on surface quality and aesthetic properties following coffee thermocycling

Diler Deniz, Sena Kamacı Ergül, Cumhur Altıntaş
BMC Oral Health
Dental materials and restorations
article

Optimizing CAD/CAM ceramics: a comparative study of polishing and glazing effects on surface quality and aesthetic properties following coffee thermocycling

Diler Deniz, Sena Kamacı Ergül, Cumhur Altıntaş
article en

Abstract

This in vitro study aims to evaluate the effects of two different surface finishing procedures-glazing and polishing-on the stability of colour, the translucency, and the roughness of surface with three CAD/CAM ceramic materials: lithium disilicate ceramic (LDC), zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate ceramic (ZLC), and translucent zirconia (TrZ). The process is evaluated before and after coffee thermocycling. A total of 120 samples (1.0 ± 0.1 mm) were prepared from LDC (IPS e.max CAD HT A2), ZLC (Celtra Duo HT A2), and TrZ (Cercon HT A2). All samples were subjected to standardized grinding for 20 s to simulate chairside adjustments and were then assigned to glaze (G) or polish (P) subgroups (n = 20). Surface roughness (Ra, Rz) was measured by using a contact profilometer, while colour coordinates (L*, a*, b*), colour difference (ΔE₀₀) (∆E00), and translucency parameter (TP) were recorded with a colorimeter. All samples underwent 10,000 coffee thermocycles (5–55 °C). Data were analysed by using one-way ANOVA, repeated-measures ANOVA, Kruskal–Wallis, and appropriate post-hoc tests (α = 0.05). It is seen that grinding produced the highest Ra and Rz values in ZLC, followed by LDC and TrZ. When surface treatments were completed, polished TrZ showed a significantly lower Ra compared with glazed TrZ, while ZLC and LDC exhibited lower roughness after glazing, although not significantly. Only the ZLC-P group demonstrated a perceptible colour change, yet all groups remained within the clinically acceptable threshold (< 2.23). Before and after thermocycling, LDC showed the highest TP values, followed by ZLC and TrZ. Thermocycling significantly increased Ra (except in TrZ-P and ZLC-P) and decreased TP values in all materials except LDC-P. Based on the results, it is concluded that surface finishing techniques and coffee thermocycling affect the optical and surface properties of CAD/CAM ceramics. Glazing generally provides smoother surfaces for glass-ceramics, whereas polishing has superior outcomes for translucent zirconia.

BMC Oral Health
Ministry of Health (TR), Hacettepe University (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.