Spatial identification of areas suitable for other effective area‐based conservation measures in the European Union

Although significant biodiversity has been safeguarded by protected areas (PAs), biodiversity trends continue downward. Within the frameworks of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the new EU Restoration Regulation (2024), conserving critical biodiversity areas is essential. One promising approach is other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs), which offer alternative pathways for in situ conservation. We identified sites across the EU that are not PAs but could contribute to conservation and be recognized as OECMs, and determined the potential contribution of these sites to biodiversity conservation. We partially applied the IUCN framework for OECM establishment across the entire EU with a focus on Greece and France. This framework is a three-step process (screening, consent, and full assessment), the full application of which requires data related to the governance and management regime of the area, long-term goals, and other site-specific information. Such data are typically available only at the site-based level. Hence, we based our analyses primarily on capturing biodiversity values within geographically defined areas based on freely available European data (e.g., landscape indices, habitats, and species statuses). We found that areas suitable for OECMs could cover up to 10% of European land and make substantial contributions to the EU's target of protecting 30% of its land by 2030. At the national level, we found that achieving biodiversity conservation outcomes with OECMs was uncertain. Accordingly, OECM confirmation must account for both the biodiversity value of proposed sites and the governance and management practices that support their effectiveness. Our approach highlights the potential of OECMs to enhance conservation efforts in support of a more resilient biodiversity landscape across Europe.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70263
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatial identification of areas suitable for other effective area‐based conservation measures in the European Union

Dimitrios Bormpoudakis, Konstantina Apostolopoulou, N Burgess, Stefanos Boutsios et al.
Conservation Biology
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Spatial identification of areas suitable for other effective area‐based conservation measures in the European Union

Dimitrios Bormpoudakis, Konstantina Apostolopoulou, N Burgess, Stefanos Boutsios, Joseph Tzanopoulos, Roxanne Suzette Lorilla, Jasmin Upton, Alexandra Demertzi, Evangelia G. Drakou, Emily Howland, Ioannis Vogiatzakis, Pierre Bonnet, George Kefalas, Heather Bingham, Camino Liquete
article en

Abstract

Although significant biodiversity has been safeguarded by protected areas (PAs), biodiversity trends continue downward. Within the frameworks of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and the new EU Restoration Regulation (2024), conserving critical biodiversity areas is essential. One promising approach is other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs), which offer alternative pathways for in situ conservation. We identified sites across the EU that are not PAs but could contribute to conservation and be recognized as OECMs, and determined the potential contribution of these sites to biodiversity conservation. We partially applied the IUCN framework for OECM establishment across the entire EU with a focus on Greece and France. This framework is a three-step process (screening, consent, and full assessment), the full application of which requires data related to the governance and management regime of the area, long-term goals, and other site-specific information. Such data are typically available only at the site-based level. Hence, we based our analyses primarily on capturing biodiversity values within geographically defined areas based on freely available European data (e.g., landscape indices, habitats, and species statuses). We found that areas suitable for OECMs could cover up to 10% of European land and make substantial contributions to the EU's target of protecting 30% of its land by 2030. At the national level, we found that achieving biodiversity conservation outcomes with OECMs was uncertain. Accordingly, OECM confirmation must account for both the biodiversity value of proposed sites and the governance and management practices that support their effectiveness. Our approach highlights the potential of OECMs to enhance conservation efforts in support of a more resilient biodiversity landscape across Europe.

Conservation Biology
University of Copenhagen (DK), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Centre de Coopération Internationale en Recherche Agronomique pour le Développement (FR), Democritus University of Thrace (GR), UN Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (GB), Université de Montpellier (FR), University of Kent (GB), University of Cambridge (GB), Harokopio University of Athens (GR), Joint Research Centre (IT), National Observatory of Athens (GR), UMR Botanique et Modélisation de l’Architecture des Plantes et des végétations (FR), Wildlife Conservation Society United Kingdom (GB), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT), Open University of Cyprus (CY)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.