Hemodynamic performance and blood damage of the Intra-aortic pumps: A CFD-Based investigation

Three intra-aortic blood pumps were evaluated and compared using CFD simulations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the hemodynamic performance and calculate the hemolytic potential of the pumps. The flow fields generated by the pumps were simulated using CFD with a wall-modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES) approach. The simulations produced pressure-flow curves, hydraulic efficiency, shear stress distributions, and hemolysis predictions. A grid study was conducted using the Grid Convergence Index (GCI) method, and a new dimensionless parameter, the Hemolytic Number (HN), was introduced as a standardized metric to compare hemolysis and universal pump performance. The impeller-driven pump had the highest-pressure head (~ 800 Pa at 4 L/min) and the best hydraulic efficiency (~ 6% at 14 L/min), outperforming both the single (maximum 2.7%) and triplet (maximum 2.2%) pumps. The NIH values were also lowest for the impeller pump (NIH ≈ 0.0035 g/100L), indicating high hemocompatibility. Both the single and triplet pumps showed regions of recirculation, particularly at lower flow rates. A smaller HN indicates better hemocompatibility; for the impeller-driven pump, HN remains below 1 across the investigated flow rates. Overall, the impeller-driven pump outperformed the other designs in terms of both hemodynamic and hemolytic measurements. The findings provide valuable insights for the future development of intra-aortic pumps and the personalized selection of devices for individual patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03550-y
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hemodynamic performance and blood damage of the Intra-aortic pumps: A CFD-Based investigation

Osman Aycan, Lyes Kadem, Yeojin Park
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Hemodynamic performance and blood damage of the Intra-aortic pumps: A CFD-Based investigation

Osman Aycan, Lyes Kadem, Yeojin Park
article en

Abstract

Three intra-aortic blood pumps were evaluated and compared using CFD simulations. The aim of this study is to evaluate the hemodynamic performance and calculate the hemolytic potential of the pumps. The flow fields generated by the pumps were simulated using CFD with a wall-modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES) approach. The simulations produced pressure-flow curves, hydraulic efficiency, shear stress distributions, and hemolysis predictions. A grid study was conducted using the Grid Convergence Index (GCI) method, and a new dimensionless parameter, the Hemolytic Number (HN), was introduced as a standardized metric to compare hemolysis and universal pump performance. The impeller-driven pump had the highest-pressure head (~ 800 Pa at 4 L/min) and the best hydraulic efficiency (~ 6% at 14 L/min), outperforming both the single (maximum 2.7%) and triplet (maximum 2.2%) pumps. The NIH values were also lowest for the impeller pump (NIH ≈ 0.0035 g/100L), indicating high hemocompatibility. Both the single and triplet pumps showed regions of recirculation, particularly at lower flow rates. A smaller HN indicates better hemocompatibility; for the impeller-driven pump, HN remains below 1 across the investigated flow rates. Overall, the impeller-driven pump outperformed the other designs in terms of both hemodynamic and hemolytic measurements. The findings provide valuable insights for the future development of intra-aortic pumps and the personalized selection of devices for individual patients.

Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University (TR), Concordia University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.