Public transport accessibility equity: A comprehensive distributive assessment in France

• A fine-grained job accessibility index is developed in 140 French areas. • Spatial models capture the impacts of poverty on accessibility in each area. • Higher poverty concentration does not imply substantially better job accessibility. • Accessibility distribution does not meet the equity criteria. • Results stress the need to improve transit accessibility in disadvantaged zones. The distribution of accessibility is a key metric of transport equity. While increasingly studied, current assessments could be enhanced by a clearer framing of the equity principles evaluated, broader sample diversity, and the use of spatial statistics. This research evaluates an equity scenario assuming that the urban system prioritizes the poorest areas. We test whether poorer areas benefit from better job accessibility by public transport than other areas with a similar geographic context. To this end, we compute an accessibility index across 140 areas, combining high spatial resolution with comprehensive nationwide coverage, and analyze it using spatial econometric models. Results show that higher-poverty areas have accessibility levels similar to those in other comparable areas—a pattern that falls short of this equity goal. These findings call for stronger policy interventions targeting disadvantaged neighborhoods. Future research could assess complementary equity criteria, for which we suggest potential avenues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2026.105305
Primary Topic
Urban Transport and Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public transport accessibility equity: A comprehensive distributive assessment in France

Louafi Bouzouina, Dominique Mignot, Thibault Isambourg
Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment
Urban Transport and Accessibility
article

Public transport accessibility equity: A comprehensive distributive assessment in France

Louafi Bouzouina, Dominique Mignot, Thibault Isambourg
article en

Abstract

• A fine-grained job accessibility index is developed in 140 French areas. • Spatial models capture the impacts of poverty on accessibility in each area. • Higher poverty concentration does not imply substantially better job accessibility. • Accessibility distribution does not meet the equity criteria. • Results stress the need to improve transit accessibility in disadvantaged zones. The distribution of accessibility is a key metric of transport equity. While increasingly studied, current assessments could be enhanced by a clearer framing of the equity principles evaluated, broader sample diversity, and the use of spatial statistics. This research evaluates an equity scenario assuming that the urban system prioritizes the poorest areas. We test whether poorer areas benefit from better job accessibility by public transport than other areas with a similar geographic context. To this end, we compute an accessibility index across 140 areas, combining high spatial resolution with comprehensive nationwide coverage, and analyze it using spatial econometric models. Results show that higher-poverty areas have accessibility levels similar to those in other comparable areas—a pattern that falls short of this equity goal. These findings call for stronger policy interventions targeting disadvantaged neighborhoods. Future research could assess complementary equity criteria, for which we suggest potential avenues.

Transportation Research Part D Transport and EnvironmentVol. 155
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Transgene (France) (FR), Laboratoire Aménagement Économie Transports (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Urban Transport and Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.