A review of illicit drug and terrorism financing literature: Establishing a future socioeconomic research agenda

Illicit drugs and terrorism are responsible for thousands of deaths each year. To better combat the criminal organisations involved, an improved understanding of their financial operations is necessary. Analysing how these drug and terrorism financing organisations reach a payment agreement and mitigate the associated shortcomings of bounded rationality requires using socioeconomic strategies: market, bureaucracy and trust. This research evaluates the current body of literature on the financing of drugs and terrorism by applying a scoping review. The review assesses how these socioeconomic strategies are studied and what the gaps in the research in this field are. Based on this assessment, a socioeconomic-based research agenda on the financing of drugs and terrorism is established. The scoping review indicates that the socioeconomic strategies not only play a role in coming to an agreement on a deal but also are an integral part of the structures of the criminal organisations. These findings can help researchers and government officials to better understand these illicit organisations. Research on socioeconomic strategies could be improved. The research on terrorism financing often lacks empirical methods. Additionally, bureaucracy is an under-researched strategy in both drug and terrorism financing. Unlike the consensus in the socioeconomic field, the strategies of market, bureaucracy, and trust are studied separately or in pairs, rather than in combination of all three.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Economic Criminology
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2026.100218
Primary Topic
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A review of illicit drug and terrorism financing literature: Establishing a future socioeconomic research agenda

Victor Daniël van Santvoord
Journal of Economic Criminology
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
article

A review of illicit drug and terrorism financing literature: Establishing a future socioeconomic research agenda

Victor Daniël van Santvoord
article en

Abstract

Illicit drugs and terrorism are responsible for thousands of deaths each year. To better combat the criminal organisations involved, an improved understanding of their financial operations is necessary. Analysing how these drug and terrorism financing organisations reach a payment agreement and mitigate the associated shortcomings of bounded rationality requires using socioeconomic strategies: market, bureaucracy and trust. This research evaluates the current body of literature on the financing of drugs and terrorism by applying a scoping review. The review assesses how these socioeconomic strategies are studied and what the gaps in the research in this field are. Based on this assessment, a socioeconomic-based research agenda on the financing of drugs and terrorism is established. The scoping review indicates that the socioeconomic strategies not only play a role in coming to an agreement on a deal but also are an integral part of the structures of the criminal organisations. These findings can help researchers and government officials to better understand these illicit organisations. Research on socioeconomic strategies could be improved. The research on terrorism financing often lacks empirical methods. Additionally, bureaucracy is an under-researched strategy in both drug and terrorism financing. Unlike the consensus in the socioeconomic field, the strategies of market, bureaucracy, and trust are studied separately or in pairs, rather than in combination of all three.

Journal of Economic CriminologyVol. 12
Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.