APR-Lite Substrate v9: Governance-Layer Vulnerability Matrix

This technical note documents the governance-layer vulnerability matrix for the APR-Lite substrate governance platform at version 9. It identifies ten vulnerability classes — the places where governance substrates fail even when all functional tests pass — and describes the nature of each class and the governance mitigations implemented in response. The central thesis is that governance substrates require adversarial analysis distinct from functional testing. A substrate that passes all scenario tests may still be vulnerable to prompt-layer bypass attempts, silent contract fallbacks, semantic laundering across agent chains, authority-root misalignment, cascade timing exploits, and output classes that are technically admissible but substantively unsafe. This matrix names and addresses each class. Note on scope: Detailed test methodologies are withheld from this public summary. The vulnerability class names, descriptions, and mitigations are provided to support governance research and standards development without enabling exploitation of the specific vulnerabilities described.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19152678
Primary Topic
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

APR-Lite Substrate v9: Governance-Layer Vulnerability Matrix

Narnaiezzsshaa Truong
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
article

APR-Lite Substrate v9: Governance-Layer Vulnerability Matrix

Narnaiezzsshaa Truong
article en

Abstract

This technical note documents the governance-layer vulnerability matrix for the APR-Lite substrate governance platform at version 9. It identifies ten vulnerability classes — the places where governance substrates fail even when all functional tests pass — and describes the nature of each class and the governance mitigations implemented in response. The central thesis is that governance substrates require adversarial analysis distinct from functional testing. A substrate that passes all scenario tests may still be vulnerable to prompt-layer bypass attempts, silent contract fallbacks, semantic laundering across agent chains, authority-root misalignment, cascade timing exploits, and output classes that are technically admissible but substantively unsafe. This matrix names and addresses each class. Note on scope: Detailed test methodologies are withheld from this public summary. The vulnerability class names, descriptions, and mitigations are provided to support governance research and standards development without enabling exploitation of the specific vulnerabilities described.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
American Rock Mechanics Association (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.