Rethinking architectural design education and practice with AI: a cognitive–social–technical perspective

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping building design education and practice, yet its role remains contested. This study examines how AI is being applied across design stages and how its integration can be understood as a holistic and dynamic phenomenon. Drawing on 30 semi-structured interviews with professionals, academics, and students in Australia, a mixed-method analysis was conducted. Frequency analysis reveals that AI is most often used in early phases of design, including ideation, concept development, and visualisation, with more limited uptake in communication, documentation, and regulatory tasks. Hybrid content–thematic analysis highlights how participants conceptualise AI in multiple ways: as a material that expands representational resources, as a creativity support tool that accelerates iteration and enhances productivity, and as a collaborator that reconfigures authorship, decision-making, and team dynamics. These roles are not fixed but shift across contexts, underscoring the hybrid and dynamic character of human–AI design processes. The findings further demonstrate how AI reshapes cognitive processes of reflection and problem-solving, mediates social dynamics of collaboration and culture, and interacts with technical systems of task allocation and integration. Two emergent themes, (i) active learning and (ii) sustainable and ethical practice, point to AI’s potential for transforming pedagogy and contributing to global challenges. By extending sociotechnical perspectives into a Cognitive–Social–Technical (C–S–T) framework, the study advances theoretical, pedagogical, and empirical insights into AI’s evolving role as a collaborator in architectural design education and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-026-10080-z
Primary Topic
Architecture and Computational Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking architectural design education and practice with AI: a cognitive–social–technical perspective

Michael J. Ostwald, Samaneh Arasteh, Ju Hyun Lee
International Journal of Technology and Design Education
Architecture and Computational Design
article

Rethinking architectural design education and practice with AI: a cognitive–social–technical perspective

Michael J. Ostwald, Samaneh Arasteh, Ju Hyun Lee
article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping building design education and practice, yet its role remains contested. This study examines how AI is being applied across design stages and how its integration can be understood as a holistic and dynamic phenomenon. Drawing on 30 semi-structured interviews with professionals, academics, and students in Australia, a mixed-method analysis was conducted. Frequency analysis reveals that AI is most often used in early phases of design, including ideation, concept development, and visualisation, with more limited uptake in communication, documentation, and regulatory tasks. Hybrid content–thematic analysis highlights how participants conceptualise AI in multiple ways: as a material that expands representational resources, as a creativity support tool that accelerates iteration and enhances productivity, and as a collaborator that reconfigures authorship, decision-making, and team dynamics. These roles are not fixed but shift across contexts, underscoring the hybrid and dynamic character of human–AI design processes. The findings further demonstrate how AI reshapes cognitive processes of reflection and problem-solving, mediates social dynamics of collaboration and culture, and interacts with technical systems of task allocation and integration. Two emergent themes, (i) active learning and (ii) sustainable and ethical practice, point to AI’s potential for transforming pedagogy and contributing to global challenges. By extending sociotechnical perspectives into a Cognitive–Social–Technical (C–S–T) framework, the study advances theoretical, pedagogical, and empirical insights into AI’s evolving role as a collaborator in architectural design education and practice.

International Journal of Technology and Design Education
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Architecture and Computational Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.