Equity in Intervention Design: A Workshop Report and Recommendations for Intervention Planners

There is a demand for new interventions to address complex social and political challenges arising from racism, colonisation, and oppression. To achieve this, equity must be at the forefront of program planning and decision making. Intervention Mapping is one of the most widely used program planning, design, implementation, and evaluation approaches. While the steps, tasks and core processes of Intervention Mapping provide a clear rationale and framework to develop programs that address equity, there is limited guidance and examples of how to operationalise this in practice. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study through a two-day workshop in Melbourne, Australia with multi-disciplinary practitioners and leaders from health, education and social care organisations and government departments, entitled “Equity in Program Development”. The workshop focused on Intervention Mapping Step 1: needs assessment, Step 2: define program outcomes and objectives, Step 3: program design and Step 4: program production. Using these steps the workshop aimed to: (1) explore how equity is considered and operationalised in participants’ organisations; (2) identify the enablers and barriers for developing and delivering equitable programs; and (3) generate practical guidance for program planners, including actions and guiding questions to embed equity within Intervention Mapping Steps 1 to 4. Transcribed data from small group discussions and individual written reflections were analysed thematically using a deductive approach guided by the research objectives. Actions to include equity in program planning included intentionally planning for equity, building equitable teams, skills and processes, generating ideas for embedding equity from other approaches, allowing time and space, leadership and organisational support, accessing resources and support, and shifting policy and funding processes. Based on the feedback and insights shared during this workshop, an initial Intervention Mapping - Equity (IM-Equity) Tool was developed for program planners.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43477-026-00220-x
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Equity in Intervention Design: A Workshop Report and Recommendations for Intervention Planners

Ariana Kurzeme, Nick Halfpenny, Angela Melder, Hilary Veale et al.
Global Implementation Research and Applications
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Equity in Intervention Design: A Workshop Report and Recommendations for Intervention Planners

Ariana Kurzeme, Nick Halfpenny, Angela Melder, Hilary Veale, Michelle Gooey, Ahlia Griffiths, Jozica Kutin, Carl May, Helen Cunningham, Amanda O’Connor, Sarah Kearney, Claire Blewitt, Crystal Boothby, Siarn Rakic, Rebecca L. Madill, Helen Skouteris, Allison Ibrhaim, Ninevah Hooper, Maria Fernandez, Michelle Leembruggen, Mike Davis, Sarah Davies, Lee Cameron, Susan Greenaway, Heather Morris, Christopher Higgins, Stefanie Perri, Pauline Ho
article en

Abstract

There is a demand for new interventions to address complex social and political challenges arising from racism, colonisation, and oppression. To achieve this, equity must be at the forefront of program planning and decision making. Intervention Mapping is one of the most widely used program planning, design, implementation, and evaluation approaches. While the steps, tasks and core processes of Intervention Mapping provide a clear rationale and framework to develop programs that address equity, there is limited guidance and examples of how to operationalise this in practice. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative study through a two-day workshop in Melbourne, Australia with multi-disciplinary practitioners and leaders from health, education and social care organisations and government departments, entitled “Equity in Program Development”. The workshop focused on Intervention Mapping Step 1: needs assessment, Step 2: define program outcomes and objectives, Step 3: program design and Step 4: program production. Using these steps the workshop aimed to: (1) explore how equity is considered and operationalised in participants’ organisations; (2) identify the enablers and barriers for developing and delivering equitable programs; and (3) generate practical guidance for program planners, including actions and guiding questions to embed equity within Intervention Mapping Steps 1 to 4. Transcribed data from small group discussions and individual written reflections were analysed thematically using a deductive approach guided by the research objectives. Actions to include equity in program planning included intentionally planning for equity, building equitable teams, skills and processes, generating ideas for embedding equity from other approaches, allowing time and space, leadership and organisational support, accessing resources and support, and shifting policy and funding processes. Based on the feedback and insights shared during this workshop, an initial Intervention Mapping - Equity (IM-Equity) Tool was developed for program planners.

Global Implementation Research and Applications
Hewlett-Packard (United States) (US), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Mornington Peninsula Shire (AU), Government of Victoria (AU), Good Shepherd College (NZ), Department of Health and Aged Care (AU), University of Warwick (GB), Queen Elizabeth II Medical Centre (AU), London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU), Peninsula Health (AU), Services Australia (AU), Gardiner Foundation (AU), Monash University (AU), The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.