State promotion of global women’s rights in the Universal Periodic Review

This study investigates the characteristics of countries that actively promote global women’s rights, focusing on their participation in the Universal Periodic Review process at the United Nations Human Rights Council. The UPR process allows states to make voluntary recommendations on various human rights issues, including gender equality. By analyzing which states provide multiple recommendations on women’s rights, we can infer their commitment to advancing these issues on a global scale. We hypothesize that states prioritizing women’s political empowerment within their own borders are more likely to reflect these values internationally by offering numerous recommendations on gender-related matters. Furthermore, states with higher levels of socialization through international women’s rights regimes are anticipated to be more proactive in making recommendations on gender issues. Our study utilizes UPR recommendation data from 2008 to 2022 to evaluate these domestic and international effects. While mixed, the empirical findings indicate that international factors more consistently influence states’ UPR gender-based recommendations than domestic factors. This research contributes to the understanding of how domestic and international dynamics intersect in the realm of global gender advocacy, offering insights into the motivations and behaviors of states within international human rights institutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of International Organizations
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-026-09619-5
Primary Topic
Gender Politics and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State promotion of global women’s rights in the Universal Periodic Review

Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, Yooneui Kim, Nila Zarepour-Arizi
The Review of International Organizations
Gender Politics and Representation
article

State promotion of global women’s rights in the Universal Periodic Review

Sara McLaughlin Mitchell, Yooneui Kim, Nila Zarepour-Arizi
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the characteristics of countries that actively promote global women’s rights, focusing on their participation in the Universal Periodic Review process at the United Nations Human Rights Council. The UPR process allows states to make voluntary recommendations on various human rights issues, including gender equality. By analyzing which states provide multiple recommendations on women’s rights, we can infer their commitment to advancing these issues on a global scale. We hypothesize that states prioritizing women’s political empowerment within their own borders are more likely to reflect these values internationally by offering numerous recommendations on gender-related matters. Furthermore, states with higher levels of socialization through international women’s rights regimes are anticipated to be more proactive in making recommendations on gender issues. Our study utilizes UPR recommendation data from 2008 to 2022 to evaluate these domestic and international effects. While mixed, the empirical findings indicate that international factors more consistently influence states’ UPR gender-based recommendations than domestic factors. This research contributes to the understanding of how domestic and international dynamics intersect in the realm of global gender advocacy, offering insights into the motivations and behaviors of states within international human rights institutions.

The Review of International Organizations
Texas Tech University (US), University of Iowa (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gender Politics and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.