Unpacking the Contribution of Birth Circumstances to Inequality Using a Shapley Decomposition: The Case of Chile

ABSTRACT This study examines the role of inherited circumstances in labor market inequality of opportunity in Chile. We estimate their contribution as the change in total inequality after removing their influence. Since this contribution may differ depending on whether it is measured before or after removing the influence of other factors, we use the Shapley decomposition method. Traditional path‐dependent decompositions misrepresent the role of circumstances by ignoring their interaction with inter‐ and intra‐group inequality—overstating (Gini) or understating (entropy‐based measures). Circumstances explained 27%–28% of inequality in 2022 using entropy measures, and 17% when emphasizing outcomes for the poorest. In contrast, the Gini index attributes 36% of inequality to circumstances. Despite some fluctuations, inequality of opportunity has remained persistent and a key driver of overall inequality since the financial crisis. We also apply a Recentered Influence Function decomposition to examine the specific contributions of different population groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Income and Wealth
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.70064
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the Contribution of Birth Circumstances to Inequality Using a Shapley Decomposition: The Case of Chile

Carlos Gradín, Gabriela Zapata‐Román
Review of Income and Wealth
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Unpacking the Contribution of Birth Circumstances to Inequality Using a Shapley Decomposition: The Case of Chile

Carlos Gradín, Gabriela Zapata‐Román
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the role of inherited circumstances in labor market inequality of opportunity in Chile. We estimate their contribution as the change in total inequality after removing their influence. Since this contribution may differ depending on whether it is measured before or after removing the influence of other factors, we use the Shapley decomposition method. Traditional path‐dependent decompositions misrepresent the role of circumstances by ignoring their interaction with inter‐ and intra‐group inequality—overstating (Gini) or understating (entropy‐based measures). Circumstances explained 27%–28% of inequality in 2022 using entropy measures, and 17% when emphasizing outcomes for the poorest. In contrast, the Gini index attributes 36% of inequality to circumstances. Despite some fluctuations, inequality of opportunity has remained persistent and a key driver of overall inequality since the financial crisis. We also apply a Recentered Influence Function decomposition to examine the specific contributions of different population groups.

Review of Income and WealthVol. 72(2)
University of Manchester (GB), Universidad Central de Chile (CL), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.