Impact of good glycemic control on survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with diabetes mellitus

While diabetes mellitus (DM) has been reported as a risk factor for development and prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the specific impact of glycemic control on clinical outcomes remains poorly defined. Therefore, we investigated how glycemic status influences survival specifically in patients with comorbid PDAC and DM. The clinical data of PDAC patients with DM were collected via the database of Samsung Medical Center. They were categorized according to the duration of DM; long-standing DM (LSDM), new-onset DM (NODM), and type 3c DM (T3cDM). Glycemic status was assessed using hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. The effect of glycemic control on overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis. A total of 255 patients that consisted of 195 patients with HbA1c < 8% and 60 patients with HbA1c ≥ 8% were included in analysis. PDAC patients with HbA1c < 8% had better OS than those with HbA1c ≥ 8% (median OS: 2.5 years vs. 1.2 years; p = 0.0003). The LSDM group had the worst survival, while the T3cDM group had the best survival (median OS: 1.7 years vs. 7.2 years; p = 0.0027). In multivariable analysis, HbA1c ≥ 8% (HR = 1.54, 95%CI 1.07–2.17), age ≥ 65 (HR = 1.83, 95%CI 1.34–2.50), stage Ⅳ (HR = 2.04, 95%CI 1.45–2.84), and male (HR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.11–2.11) were identified as poor prognostic factors for PDAC. Good glycemic control is associated with prolonged OS in PDAC and it implies managing glycemic status could help to improve the prognosis of these patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04733-5
Primary Topic
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of good glycemic control on survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with diabetes mellitus

Woo Kyung Lee Doolittle, Hyun Joo Lee, Kyu Taek Lee
BMC Gastroenterology
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
article

Impact of good glycemic control on survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with diabetes mellitus

Woo Kyung Lee Doolittle, Hyun Joo Lee, Kyu Taek Lee
article en

Abstract

While diabetes mellitus (DM) has been reported as a risk factor for development and prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the specific impact of glycemic control on clinical outcomes remains poorly defined. Therefore, we investigated how glycemic status influences survival specifically in patients with comorbid PDAC and DM. The clinical data of PDAC patients with DM were collected via the database of Samsung Medical Center. They were categorized according to the duration of DM; long-standing DM (LSDM), new-onset DM (NODM), and type 3c DM (T3cDM). Glycemic status was assessed using hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels. The effect of glycemic control on overall survival (OS) was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier method and Cox analysis. A total of 255 patients that consisted of 195 patients with HbA1c < 8% and 60 patients with HbA1c ≥ 8% were included in analysis. PDAC patients with HbA1c < 8% had better OS than those with HbA1c ≥ 8% (median OS: 2.5 years vs. 1.2 years; p = 0.0003). The LSDM group had the worst survival, while the T3cDM group had the best survival (median OS: 1.7 years vs. 7.2 years; p = 0.0027). In multivariable analysis, HbA1c ≥ 8% (HR = 1.54, 95%CI 1.07–2.17), age ≥ 65 (HR = 1.83, 95%CI 1.34–2.50), stage Ⅳ (HR = 2.04, 95%CI 1.45–2.84), and male (HR = 1.52, 95%CI 1.11–2.11) were identified as poor prognostic factors for PDAC. Good glycemic control is associated with prolonged OS in PDAC and it implies managing glycemic status could help to improve the prognosis of these patients.

BMC Gastroenterology
Samsung Medical Center (KR), University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.