Comparative evaluation of four categories of serum biomarkers for detecting bone metastasis in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 119 studies

Abstract Background Bone metastasis in lung cancer worsens prognosis, highlighting the need for reliable serum biomarkers for early detection and risk stratification. Methods Five databases were searched. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess the association between biomarkers and bone metastasis. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q and I 2 tests. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, Egger’s test, and the trim-and-fill analysis. Results A total of 119 studies involving 12,409 patients were included. Pooled analyses showed significant associations between bone metastasis and several biomarkers, including traditional tumor markers: CEA (SMD = 3.03, 95% CI 2.52–3.55, P < 0.001), CA125 (SMD = 3.82, 95% CI 3.04–4.60, P < 0.001), CA153 (SMD = 2.52, 95% CI 0.98–4.06, p = 0.001), and CYFRA21-1 (SMD = 1.68, 95% CI 1.37–1.99, P < 0.001); bone formation markers: bALP (SMD = 2.84, 95% CI 1.78–3.90, P < 0.001), T-ALP (SMD = 1.28, 95% CI 0.43–2.13, p = 0.003), PINP (SMD = 1.59, 95% CI 1.10–2.07, P < 0.001), and N-MID (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI 0.37–1.36, p = 0.001); bone resorption markers: β-CTX (SMD = 1.35, 95% CI 0.82–1.88, P < 0.001), NTx (SMD = 1.74, 95% CI 1.07–2.41, P < 0.001), and ICTP (SMD = 2.11, 95% CI 1.50–2.72, P < 0.001); and bone microenvironment and regulatory factors: BSP (SMD = 1.62, 95% CI 1.21–2.02, P < 0.001), ODF (SMD = 4.59, 95% CI 3.92–5.25, P < 0.001), calcium (SMD = 1.18, 95% CI 0.77–1.60, P < 0.001), OCIF (SMD = 4.97, 95% CI 3.64–6.30, P < 0.001), PTHrP (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI 0.68–1.08, P < 0.001), calcitonin (SMD = 1.81, 95% CI 0.48–3.15, p = 0.008), and calcineurin (SMD = 3.51, 95% CI 2.31–4.71, P < 0.001). In contrast, NSE, CICP, osteocalcin, CTX, TRACP-5b, and RANKL/OPG were not consistently associated. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of most findings, though heterogeneity and publication bias were noted. Conclusions Multiple serum biomarkers are associated with lung cancer bone metastasis and may serve as complementary tools for early detection and risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-04295-y
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative evaluation of four categories of serum biomarkers for detecting bone metastasis in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 119 studies

X. He, Caiyang Liu, J. F. Li, Hong Shao et al.
European journal of medical research
Bone health and treatments
article

Comparative evaluation of four categories of serum biomarkers for detecting bone metastasis in lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 119 studies

X. He, Caiyang Liu, J. F. Li, Hong Shao, Lei Luo, Ran Ran, Yu Lei, Yi Wang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Bone metastasis in lung cancer worsens prognosis, highlighting the need for reliable serum biomarkers for early detection and risk stratification. Methods Five databases were searched. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess the association between biomarkers and bone metastasis. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q and I 2 tests. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were performed, and publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, Egger’s test, and the trim-and-fill analysis. Results A total of 119 studies involving 12,409 patients were included. Pooled analyses showed significant associations between bone metastasis and several biomarkers, including traditional tumor markers: CEA (SMD = 3.03, 95% CI 2.52–3.55, P < 0.001), CA125 (SMD = 3.82, 95% CI 3.04–4.60, P < 0.001), CA153 (SMD = 2.52, 95% CI 0.98–4.06, p = 0.001), and CYFRA21-1 (SMD = 1.68, 95% CI 1.37–1.99, P < 0.001); bone formation markers: bALP (SMD = 2.84, 95% CI 1.78–3.90, P < 0.001), T-ALP (SMD = 1.28, 95% CI 0.43–2.13, p = 0.003), PINP (SMD = 1.59, 95% CI 1.10–2.07, P < 0.001), and N-MID (SMD = 0.86, 95% CI 0.37–1.36, p = 0.001); bone resorption markers: β-CTX (SMD = 1.35, 95% CI 0.82–1.88, P < 0.001), NTx (SMD = 1.74, 95% CI 1.07–2.41, P < 0.001), and ICTP (SMD = 2.11, 95% CI 1.50–2.72, P < 0.001); and bone microenvironment and regulatory factors: BSP (SMD = 1.62, 95% CI 1.21–2.02, P < 0.001), ODF (SMD = 4.59, 95% CI 3.92–5.25, P < 0.001), calcium (SMD = 1.18, 95% CI 0.77–1.60, P < 0.001), OCIF (SMD = 4.97, 95% CI 3.64–6.30, P < 0.001), PTHrP (SMD = 0.88, 95% CI 0.68–1.08, P < 0.001), calcitonin (SMD = 1.81, 95% CI 0.48–3.15, p = 0.008), and calcineurin (SMD = 3.51, 95% CI 2.31–4.71, P < 0.001). In contrast, NSE, CICP, osteocalcin, CTX, TRACP-5b, and RANKL/OPG were not consistently associated. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of most findings, though heterogeneity and publication bias were noted. Conclusions Multiple serum biomarkers are associated with lung cancer bone metastasis and may serve as complementary tools for early detection and risk stratification.

European journal of medical research
Sichuan University (CN), Neijiang Normal University (CN), Sichuan Cancer Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Bone health and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.