Optimization of Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Processes Based on Operational Data Analytics

The article looks at optimization of maintenance and repair services on the base of analysis of operational data as an implementation of real movement away from mileage/calendar maintenance towards the risk based condition based system, when servicing is prescribed not on the schedule, but on basis of actual operational behavior in actual service environment, proving, that data streams (telematic streams, OBD-II/CAN parameters, DTC codes, service history, repeat service records) build an “digital trace” of operation, which value is revealed when this trace is transformed into repetitive service operations (scheduling, further diagnosis, prevention maintenance or acceptable deferral with risk control) within a service loop (the data started to “work”). From a methodological viewpoint, the paper confirms an end-to-end proposal that mixes disparate data integration, time-series-based degradation-features engineering, anomaly detection, estimating the probability of a repair event over a certain horizon and an operations-and-economics model that determines a threshold for intervention, taking into account both downtime costs and costs of missed failure, capacity and logistics of service resources. In our opinion, it’s precisely the ‘price of error’ that gives the forecasting a practical meaning, defining when it’s useful to carry out early works and when the ‘cost-effective’ choice is to wait with an additional investigation during a short validation period or collect more features, thereby avoiding unnecessary jobs and not compromising confidence in suggestions. Scientific actuality would be the formalization of the movement from fragmented operational data toward a governed service process. Meanwhile we adopt standard vocabulary such as “symptom – diagnosis – work – result” and a feedback loop after repairing, because we need to update the system and account for changes in the data, like in the case of different software versions. Practical usefulness looks like being on determining rules on fleet segments, trigger levels, etc.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19154698
Primary Topic
Transportation Systems and Logistics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimization of Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Processes Based on Operational Data Analytics

Roman Mokrynskyi
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Transportation Systems and Logistics
article

Optimization of Vehicle Maintenance and Repair Processes Based on Operational Data Analytics

Roman Mokrynskyi
article en

Abstract

The article looks at optimization of maintenance and repair services on the base of analysis of operational data as an implementation of real movement away from mileage/calendar maintenance towards the risk based condition based system, when servicing is prescribed not on the schedule, but on basis of actual operational behavior in actual service environment, proving, that data streams (telematic streams, OBD-II/CAN parameters, DTC codes, service history, repeat service records) build an “digital trace” of operation, which value is revealed when this trace is transformed into repetitive service operations (scheduling, further diagnosis, prevention maintenance or acceptable deferral with risk control) within a service loop (the data started to “work”). From a methodological viewpoint, the paper confirms an end-to-end proposal that mixes disparate data integration, time-series-based degradation-features engineering, anomaly detection, estimating the probability of a repair event over a certain horizon and an operations-and-economics model that determines a threshold for intervention, taking into account both downtime costs and costs of missed failure, capacity and logistics of service resources. In our opinion, it’s precisely the ‘price of error’ that gives the forecasting a practical meaning, defining when it’s useful to carry out early works and when the ‘cost-effective’ choice is to wait with an additional investigation during a short validation period or collect more features, thereby avoiding unnecessary jobs and not compromising confidence in suggestions. Scientific actuality would be the formalization of the movement from fragmented operational data toward a governed service process. Meanwhile we adopt standard vocabulary such as “symptom – diagnosis – work – result” and a feedback loop after repairing, because we need to update the system and account for changes in the data, like in the case of different software versions. Practical usefulness looks like being on determining rules on fleet segments, trigger levels, etc.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Kryvyi Rih National University (UA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Transportation Systems and Logistics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.