THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF UNIVERSAL EMERGENCE: A Critical–Propositional Analysis of Universal Emergence Dynamics: The Hidden Symmetry Behind Friedmann, Schrödinger and the Minus Sign We Erased (V 2.0), by C. van Hamme, in Confrontation with the Theory

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Carlos van Hamme’s Universal Emergence Dynamics: The Hidden Symmetry Behind Friedmann, Schrödinger and the Minus Sign We Erased (V 2.0) in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines whether a universal dynamics of emergence grounded in coherence, entropy, thresholds, and regime-dependent projections can be integrated into a modal ontology structured by the Seven Absolute Truths of TO. The paper argues that van Hamme’s proposal offers important points of convergence with the Theory of Objectivity, especially regarding emergence, compositionality, boundary formation, informational organization, and the processual character of cosmology. At the same time, it identifies decisive tensions concerning the ontological status of the foundational field, the logical necessity of distinction, the triadic condition of full existence, and the role of informational transcendence. Drawing on the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent developments in modal ontology, Gödelian discipline, phenomenic structures, and operational bridges, as well as broader works in modern physics and philosophy of science, the article proposes a hierarchical reading: Universal Emergence Dynamics may function as a promising physical-operational description of transitions and regimes, while the Theory of Objectivity remains the modal-ontological discipline required to ground the logical admissibility of the universe. The article concludes that the dialogue between UED and TO is philosophically fertile and scientifically productive, not because the two frameworks are identical, but because their confrontation clarifies the distinction between dynamic emergence and modal necessity, thereby opening a broader space for cosmological, ontological, and phenomenological inquiry. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Universal Emergence Dynamics; Carlos van Hamme; modal ontology; cosmology; emergence; coherence; entropy; Friedmann equation; Schrödinger equation; phenomenic structures; informational transcendence; Gödelian discipline; operational bridges; philosophy of physics

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19149174
Primary Topic
Origins and Evolution of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF UNIVERSAL EMERGENCE: A Critical–Propositional Analysis of Universal Emergence Dynamics: The Hidden Symmetry Behind Friedmann, Schrödinger and the Minus Sign We Erased (V 2.0), by C. van Hamme, in Confrontation with the Theory

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Origins and Evolution of Life
article

THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF UNIVERSAL EMERGENCE: A Critical–Propositional Analysis of Universal Emergence Dynamics: The Hidden Symmetry Behind Friedmann, Schrödinger and the Minus Sign We Erased (V 2.0), by C. van Hamme, in Confrontation with the Theory

Denivaldo Silva, Vidamor Cabannas
article en

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Carlos van Hamme’s Universal Emergence Dynamics: The Hidden Symmetry Behind Friedmann, Schrödinger and the Minus Sign We Erased (V 2.0) in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines whether a universal dynamics of emergence grounded in coherence, entropy, thresholds, and regime-dependent projections can be integrated into a modal ontology structured by the Seven Absolute Truths of TO. The paper argues that van Hamme’s proposal offers important points of convergence with the Theory of Objectivity, especially regarding emergence, compositionality, boundary formation, informational organization, and the processual character of cosmology. At the same time, it identifies decisive tensions concerning the ontological status of the foundational field, the logical necessity of distinction, the triadic condition of full existence, and the role of informational transcendence. Drawing on the foundational bibliography of TO, its recent developments in modal ontology, Gödelian discipline, phenomenic structures, and operational bridges, as well as broader works in modern physics and philosophy of science, the article proposes a hierarchical reading: Universal Emergence Dynamics may function as a promising physical-operational description of transitions and regimes, while the Theory of Objectivity remains the modal-ontological discipline required to ground the logical admissibility of the universe. The article concludes that the dialogue between UED and TO is philosophically fertile and scientifically productive, not because the two frameworks are identical, but because their confrontation clarifies the distinction between dynamic emergence and modal necessity, thereby opening a broader space for cosmological, ontological, and phenomenological inquiry. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; Universal Emergence Dynamics; Carlos van Hamme; modal ontology; cosmology; emergence; coherence; entropy; Friedmann equation; Schrödinger equation; phenomenic structures; informational transcendence; Gödelian discipline; operational bridges; philosophy of physics

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Origins and Evolution of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.