Large live and dead trees promote saproxylic beetle diversity and White‐backed Woodpecker breeding territories

Effective forest management to promote biodiversity requires understanding the intricate relationship between forest characteristics and species occurrence. Given that more than 25% of forest taxa are associated with dead wood, this resource has gained attention as key component of closer-to-nature forest management. The White-backed Woodpecker ( Dendrocopos leucotos ) is one of Europe’s rarest woodpeckers, and observational studies often report the species preferentially foraging on dead standing trees (i.e. snags) in deciduous forests. Despite the lack of systematic assessment of the importance of dead wood for the woodpecker and its associated saproxylic beetle community, conservation plans typically focus on snag enrichment when restoring forest patches for the target bird species. Here, we used confirmatory path analysis to compare the direct and indirect effects of structural characteristics of beech-dominated extensively managed forests on saproxylic beetle communities and on the White-backed Woodpecker activity. Using in situ eclectors, we sampled saproxylic beetle communities emerging from 87 European beech snags distributed in forests with and without the woodpecker, over a period of two years, yielding 6519 specimens represented by 156 saproxylic beetle species. While our study did not provide evidence that saproxylic beetle communities emerging from snags serve as a reliable predictor of White-backed Woodpecker activity, several habitat variables proved to be good predictors for saproxylic diversity. In addition to the positive effect of ambient temperature on saproxylic beetle richness, we identified that communities of saproxylic beetles were correlated with the diameter and the bark coverage of the snags, as well as indirectly with the diameter of the surrounding live trees. Taken together, our results emphasize the importance of promoting large live trees, benefiting subsequent late-successional dead wood resources to foster biodiversity in temperate deciduous forests. Independently of White-backed Woodpeckers known occurrence, practitioners and stakeholders should take on every opportunity of actively enhancing habitat quality where dead-wood dependent organisms occur. From retaining large live trees and snags in managed forests to focusing targeted conservation measures in forest stands where White-backed Woodpeckers occur, every measure increasing forest naturalness would ultimately benefit the fraction of biodiversity found in Central European forests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forest Ecology and Management
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2026.123720
Primary Topic
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Large live and dead trees promote saproxylic beetle diversity and White‐backed Woodpecker breeding territories

Urs G. Kormann, Antonia Ettwein, Romain Angeleri, Michael Lanz et al.
Forest Ecology and Management
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
article

Large live and dead trees promote saproxylic beetle diversity and White‐backed Woodpecker breeding territories

Urs G. Kormann, Antonia Ettwein, Romain Angeleri, Michael Lanz, Nicolas Roth, Raphaël Arlettaz, Thibault Lachat
article en

Abstract

Effective forest management to promote biodiversity requires understanding the intricate relationship between forest characteristics and species occurrence. Given that more than 25% of forest taxa are associated with dead wood, this resource has gained attention as key component of closer-to-nature forest management. The White-backed Woodpecker ( Dendrocopos leucotos ) is one of Europe’s rarest woodpeckers, and observational studies often report the species preferentially foraging on dead standing trees (i.e. snags) in deciduous forests. Despite the lack of systematic assessment of the importance of dead wood for the woodpecker and its associated saproxylic beetle community, conservation plans typically focus on snag enrichment when restoring forest patches for the target bird species. Here, we used confirmatory path analysis to compare the direct and indirect effects of structural characteristics of beech-dominated extensively managed forests on saproxylic beetle communities and on the White-backed Woodpecker activity. Using in situ eclectors, we sampled saproxylic beetle communities emerging from 87 European beech snags distributed in forests with and without the woodpecker, over a period of two years, yielding 6519 specimens represented by 156 saproxylic beetle species. While our study did not provide evidence that saproxylic beetle communities emerging from snags serve as a reliable predictor of White-backed Woodpecker activity, several habitat variables proved to be good predictors for saproxylic diversity. In addition to the positive effect of ambient temperature on saproxylic beetle richness, we identified that communities of saproxylic beetles were correlated with the diameter and the bark coverage of the snags, as well as indirectly with the diameter of the surrounding live trees. Taken together, our results emphasize the importance of promoting large live trees, benefiting subsequent late-successional dead wood resources to foster biodiversity in temperate deciduous forests. Independently of White-backed Woodpeckers known occurrence, practitioners and stakeholders should take on every opportunity of actively enhancing habitat quality where dead-wood dependent organisms occur. From retaining large live trees and snags in managed forests to focusing targeted conservation measures in forest stands where White-backed Woodpeckers occur, every measure increasing forest naturalness would ultimately benefit the fraction of biodiversity found in Central European forests.

Forest Ecology and ManagementVol. 611
University of Bern (CH), Bern University of Applied Sciences (CH), Swiss Ornithological Institute (CH), Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.