The cooperative coaching client: Clients’ responding activities to wh-questions for solution generation in coaching

While solution generation and question-answer sequences are key to change in coaching, little is known about the role of questions with a solution-oriented agenda. Even less research exists on clients’ (cooperative) responding activities. To breach this gap, we used Conversation Analysis to investigate responses to wh-questions for solution generation with a special focus on the continuum of (dis-)aligning and (dis-)affiliating responses and the degrees of clients’ (un-)cooperativeness. The sequential analysis yielded five response categories: “no(n) answer,” “repair initiation,” “not answering and refocusing,” “answering” and “extended answering.” While the response possibility space includes a range of (un-)cooperative reactions, clients display an overall willingness to answer questions with a solution-generating function: “answering” and “extended answering” make up 68.9% of responses. Additionally, in-depth analyses revealed further cooperative behaviors. Apart from their interactional cooperativeness, this suggests an interaction-type specific readiness of coaching clients to participate in their own change process, that is, an institutional cooperativeness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discourse Studies
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614456261418103
Primary Topic
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The cooperative coaching client: Clients’ responding activities to wh-questions for solution generation in coaching

Sanna Vehviläinen, Eva-Maria Graf, Melanie Fleischhacker
Discourse Studies
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
article

The cooperative coaching client: Clients’ responding activities to wh-questions for solution generation in coaching

Sanna Vehviläinen, Eva-Maria Graf, Melanie Fleischhacker
article en

Abstract

While solution generation and question-answer sequences are key to change in coaching, little is known about the role of questions with a solution-oriented agenda. Even less research exists on clients’ (cooperative) responding activities. To breach this gap, we used Conversation Analysis to investigate responses to wh-questions for solution generation with a special focus on the continuum of (dis-)aligning and (dis-)affiliating responses and the degrees of clients’ (un-)cooperativeness. The sequential analysis yielded five response categories: “no(n) answer,” “repair initiation,” “not answering and refocusing,” “answering” and “extended answering.” While the response possibility space includes a range of (un-)cooperative reactions, clients display an overall willingness to answer questions with a solution-generating function: “answering” and “extended answering” make up 68.9% of responses. Additionally, in-depth analyses revealed further cooperative behaviors. Apart from their interactional cooperativeness, this suggests an interaction-type specific readiness of coaching clients to participate in their own change process, that is, an institutional cooperativeness.

Discourse Studies
University of Eastern Finland (FI), Finland University (FI), University of Klagenfurt (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.