Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Transcervical Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Minimally Invasive Myomectomy

INTRODUCTION: Uterine leiomyomas affect up to 70% of women by menopause and are associated with abnormal uterine bleeding and bulk-related symptoms. Management of fibroids has expanded to include minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Laparoscopic RFA has been shown to reduce hospitalization, blood transfusion rates, and operative time compared with myomectomy. However, outcomes following transcervical RFA remain understudied. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore differences in demographic and surgical variables, including area of deprivation index (ADI) and distance traveled for treatment, among patients with fibroids undergoing transcervical radiofrequency ablation (T-RFA) versus minimally invasive myomectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent T-RFA and minimally invasive myomectomy from January 2021 through December 2024 at three tertiary academic medical centers located in Florida, Minnesota, and Arizona. All T-RFA procedures were included, and age-matching was performed to obtain a 1:1 cohort of patients who had laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy. Abdominal myomectomy was excluded due to the increased invasiveness of the procedure. RESULTS: The cohort included 103 patients who underwent transcervical radiofrequency ablation of fibroids (T-RFA) and 105 age-matched patients who underwent minimally invasive myomectomy at three major academic institutions. There were no differences in mean age (45.5 years in the T-RFA group vs 44.5 years in the myomectomy group) or mean body mass index (28.8 for T-RFA vs 28.5 for myomectomy). There were more nulliparous patients in the myomectomy group (p=0.0003). There were no differences in the ADI national percentiles or miles traveled to access treatment between T-RFA and myomectomy groups. Preoperative hemoglobin was significantly lower in the T-RFA group (12.1 vs 12.7, p=0.008), and procedural loss was higher in the myomectomy group (271.2 mL vs 22.1 mL, p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent T-RFA had significantly lower procedure-related blood loss compared to minimally invasive myomectomy despite similar demographic factors and lower preoperative hemoglobin levels. Additional data regarding outcomes, including need for further treatment, differences in fibroid characteristics, bleeding profile, and fertility, are being evaluated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006210.16
Primary Topic
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Transcervical Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Minimally Invasive Myomectomy

M Cantave, S. Laughlin-Tommaso, M. Mays, M. Louie et al.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
article

Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Transcervical Radiofrequency Ablation Versus Minimally Invasive Myomectomy

M Cantave, S. Laughlin-Tommaso, M. Mays, M. Louie, A. Carrubba
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Uterine leiomyomas affect up to 70% of women by menopause and are associated with abnormal uterine bleeding and bulk-related symptoms. Management of fibroids has expanded to include minimally invasive techniques such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA). Laparoscopic RFA has been shown to reduce hospitalization, blood transfusion rates, and operative time compared with myomectomy. However, outcomes following transcervical RFA remain understudied. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore differences in demographic and surgical variables, including area of deprivation index (ADI) and distance traveled for treatment, among patients with fibroids undergoing transcervical radiofrequency ablation (T-RFA) versus minimally invasive myomectomy. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent T-RFA and minimally invasive myomectomy from January 2021 through December 2024 at three tertiary academic medical centers located in Florida, Minnesota, and Arizona. All T-RFA procedures were included, and age-matching was performed to obtain a 1:1 cohort of patients who had laparoscopic or robotic myomectomy. Abdominal myomectomy was excluded due to the increased invasiveness of the procedure. RESULTS: The cohort included 103 patients who underwent transcervical radiofrequency ablation of fibroids (T-RFA) and 105 age-matched patients who underwent minimally invasive myomectomy at three major academic institutions. There were no differences in mean age (45.5 years in the T-RFA group vs 44.5 years in the myomectomy group) or mean body mass index (28.8 for T-RFA vs 28.5 for myomectomy). There were more nulliparous patients in the myomectomy group (p=0.0003). There were no differences in the ADI national percentiles or miles traveled to access treatment between T-RFA and myomectomy groups. Preoperative hemoglobin was significantly lower in the T-RFA group (12.1 vs 12.7, p=0.008), and procedural loss was higher in the myomectomy group (271.2 mL vs 22.1 mL, p=0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent T-RFA had significantly lower procedure-related blood loss compared to minimally invasive myomectomy despite similar demographic factors and lower preoperative hemoglobin levels. Additional data regarding outcomes, including need for further treatment, differences in fibroid characteristics, bleeding profile, and fertility, are being evaluated.

Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 147(4S)
WinnMed (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Uterine Myomas and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.