Deconstruction theory and queer theory: a state of flux and multiplicity of meaning

This original article argues that Derrida’s theory of deconstruction (1960s) and Queer Theory (1990s) share many commonalities and provide some frameworks for rethinking the nature of agency and mode of meaning-making in this era marked by technological advancements and translingualism. Both theories challenge the rigidity and fixity of meaning, believing in the dynamism and multiplicity of decodes on the observer’s end. Even though both philosophies have originated from different contexts, they constantly disrupt the notion of normativity, inflexibility, language, identity and power. The ultimate goal of this comparative analysis rests on the idea of providing the voiceless with agency to resist the essentialist assumptions and the permanency of knowledge, but endorses the notion of social networks and their role in creating collective meaning to seek solutions to social and cultural issues that often change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cogent Arts and Humanities
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2026.2647136
Primary Topic
African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deconstruction theory and queer theory: a state of flux and multiplicity of meaning

Amar Bahadur Sherma
Cogent Arts and Humanities
African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
article

Deconstruction theory and queer theory: a state of flux and multiplicity of meaning

Amar Bahadur Sherma
article en

Abstract

This original article argues that Derrida’s theory of deconstruction (1960s) and Queer Theory (1990s) share many commonalities and provide some frameworks for rethinking the nature of agency and mode of meaning-making in this era marked by technological advancements and translingualism. Both theories challenge the rigidity and fixity of meaning, believing in the dynamism and multiplicity of decodes on the observer’s end. Even though both philosophies have originated from different contexts, they constantly disrupt the notion of normativity, inflexibility, language, identity and power. The ultimate goal of this comparative analysis rests on the idea of providing the voiceless with agency to resist the essentialist assumptions and the permanency of knowledge, but endorses the notion of social networks and their role in creating collective meaning to seek solutions to social and cultural issues that often change.

Cogent Arts and HumanitiesVol. 13(1)
Pokhara University (NP)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.