The Limits of Developmental Stage Theories: Can Neurodevelopmental Diversity Be Described by Existing Models?

This working paper presents the hypothesis that Robert Kegan's theory of adult development and Kazimierz Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration (TPD) contain structural limitations when applied to neurodevelopmental diversity—particularly the typical characteristics associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Both theories share an implicit premise: that self-transformation through relationship and emotion constitutes the primary axis of development. This paper examines why this premise does not align with typical ASD developmental pathways, and frames the issue not as a deficiency in ASD development, but as a problem of the models' scope of application. The paper concludes that theories premised on a single developmental pathway cannot comprehensively describe neurodevelopmental diversity, and argues for the necessity of reexamining the very definition of "development." Note: This paper was prepared with the assistance of AI assistants (Claude, ChatGPT). The author discloses this as part of the research methodology.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19131155
Primary Topic
Ego Development and Educational Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Limits of Developmental Stage Theories: Can Neurodevelopmental Diversity Be Described by Existing Models?

Q Tekitou
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ego Development and Educational Practices
article

The Limits of Developmental Stage Theories: Can Neurodevelopmental Diversity Be Described by Existing Models?

Q Tekitou
article en

Abstract

This working paper presents the hypothesis that Robert Kegan's theory of adult development and Kazimierz Dabrowski's Theory of Positive Disintegration (TPD) contain structural limitations when applied to neurodevelopmental diversity—particularly the typical characteristics associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Both theories share an implicit premise: that self-transformation through relationship and emotion constitutes the primary axis of development. This paper examines why this premise does not align with typical ASD developmental pathways, and frames the issue not as a deficiency in ASD development, but as a problem of the models' scope of application. The paper concludes that theories premised on a single developmental pathway cannot comprehensively describe neurodevelopmental diversity, and argues for the necessity of reexamining the very definition of "development." Note: This paper was prepared with the assistance of AI assistants (Claude, ChatGPT). The author discloses this as part of the research methodology.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Ego Development and Educational Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.