Comparison Between Browser- and App-Based Versions of a Program for Self-Management of Mild to Moderate Depression: Log Data Analysis of a Convenience Sample
Despite the improved availability of the app version in daily life, there were no significant differences in the use parameters we analyzed and no differences in symptom reduction. This study provides the first evidence that adherence to iCBT content is comparable for browser- and app-based interventions and that symptom reduction is similar for both formats. However, this study used a convenience sample, and therefore, the results must be interpreted with caution. Notably, in the study of the iFD tool, guidance was provided by the study assistants in a standardized manner. In the pilot study on the iFD app, the amount of guidance varied substantially, as it was provided by the participants' health care practitioners. These differences in guidance could also have an influence on adherence.
Authors
- Katharina Scholze (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-474X)
- Caroline Allenhof (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8329-147X)
- Ulrich Hegerl
Institutions
- Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
- European Alliance Against Depression (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- JMIR mhealth and uhealth
- Published
- 2026-03-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.2196/58835
- Primary Topic
- Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00