Comparison Between Browser- and App-Based Versions of a Program for Self-Management of Mild to Moderate Depression: Log Data Analysis of a Convenience Sample

Despite the improved availability of the app version in daily life, there were no significant differences in the use parameters we analyzed and no differences in symptom reduction. This study provides the first evidence that adherence to iCBT content is comparable for browser- and app-based interventions and that symptom reduction is similar for both formats. However, this study used a convenience sample, and therefore, the results must be interpreted with caution. Notably, in the study of the iFD tool, guidance was provided by the study assistants in a standardized manner. In the pilot study on the iFD app, the amount of guidance varied substantially, as it was provided by the participants' health care practitioners. These differences in guidance could also have an influence on adherence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/58835
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison Between Browser- and App-Based Versions of a Program for Self-Management of Mild to Moderate Depression: Log Data Analysis of a Convenience Sample

Katharina Scholze, Caroline Allenhof, Ulrich Hegerl
JMIR mhealth and uhealth
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Comparison Between Browser- and App-Based Versions of a Program for Self-Management of Mild to Moderate Depression: Log Data Analysis of a Convenience Sample

Katharina Scholze, Caroline Allenhof, Ulrich Hegerl
article en

Abstract

Despite the improved availability of the app version in daily life, there were no significant differences in the use parameters we analyzed and no differences in symptom reduction. This study provides the first evidence that adherence to iCBT content is comparable for browser- and app-based interventions and that symptom reduction is similar for both formats. However, this study used a convenience sample, and therefore, the results must be interpreted with caution. Notably, in the study of the iFD tool, guidance was provided by the study assistants in a standardized manner. In the pilot study on the iFD app, the amount of guidance varied substantially, as it was provided by the participants' health care practitioners. These differences in guidance could also have an influence on adherence.

JMIR mhealth and uhealthVol. 14
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), European Alliance Against Depression (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.