A call to consider the contributions of exported marine macrophyte biomass to ecosystem services

• Ecosystem services emerge from the exchange of exported biomass across connected coastal systems. • Ecosystem services provided by exported marine macrophyte biomass (EMB) are substantial but often overlooked. • Temporal, spatial, and environmental factors interact with exported biomass attributes to drive service provisioning. • EMB should be included in ecosystem service frameworks to improve coastal management. • More work is needed to determine how to account for EMB in ecosystem service valuations. As societies increasingly aim to quantify and preserve nature’s benefits, ecosystem services provided by marine ecosystems are increasingly evaluated. However, these evaluations commonly focus on single ecosystems, despite the growing evidence that ecosystems interact. Here, we investigated the ecosystem services provided by macroscopic exported macrophyte biomass (EMB) from seagrass meadows, salt marshes, mangrove forests, and macroalgae forests using a systematic literature review of EMB in marine settings. We found that vegetative biomass exported from marine macrophytes substantially contributed to the provisioning of ecosystem services in recipient ecosystems – habitat provisioning, carbon storage, nutrient cycling, and abiotic alterations, among others – but were rarely documented as such. We identified time since deposition, proximity to donor ecosystem, EMB magnitude, and EMB seasonality as drivers of ecosystem service outcomes. Knowledge gaps related to EMB ecosystem services suggest that more research is needed across 1) vegetated recipient ecosystems, 2) ecosystem service types, 3) contexts in which EMB provides ecosystem services or disservices, 4) potential management strategies, and 5) regions of the world. We call for broader consideration of the contributions of EMB to ecosystem services within ecosystem services frameworks to increase the accuracy of global valuations and enhance strategies for conserving, restoring, and managing marine ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2026.101836
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal plant biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A call to consider the contributions of exported marine macrophyte biomass to ecosystem services

Rachel S. Smith, Carolyn J. Ewers Lewis, Cora A. Baird
Ecosystem Services
Marine and coastal plant biology
article

A call to consider the contributions of exported marine macrophyte biomass to ecosystem services

Rachel S. Smith, Carolyn J. Ewers Lewis, Cora A. Baird
article en

Abstract

• Ecosystem services emerge from the exchange of exported biomass across connected coastal systems. • Ecosystem services provided by exported marine macrophyte biomass (EMB) are substantial but often overlooked. • Temporal, spatial, and environmental factors interact with exported biomass attributes to drive service provisioning. • EMB should be included in ecosystem service frameworks to improve coastal management. • More work is needed to determine how to account for EMB in ecosystem service valuations. As societies increasingly aim to quantify and preserve nature’s benefits, ecosystem services provided by marine ecosystems are increasingly evaluated. However, these evaluations commonly focus on single ecosystems, despite the growing evidence that ecosystems interact. Here, we investigated the ecosystem services provided by macroscopic exported macrophyte biomass (EMB) from seagrass meadows, salt marshes, mangrove forests, and macroalgae forests using a systematic literature review of EMB in marine settings. We found that vegetative biomass exported from marine macrophytes substantially contributed to the provisioning of ecosystem services in recipient ecosystems – habitat provisioning, carbon storage, nutrient cycling, and abiotic alterations, among others – but were rarely documented as such. We identified time since deposition, proximity to donor ecosystem, EMB magnitude, and EMB seasonality as drivers of ecosystem service outcomes. Knowledge gaps related to EMB ecosystem services suggest that more research is needed across 1) vegetated recipient ecosystems, 2) ecosystem service types, 3) contexts in which EMB provides ecosystem services or disservices, 4) potential management strategies, and 5) regions of the world. We call for broader consideration of the contributions of EMB to ecosystem services within ecosystem services frameworks to increase the accuracy of global valuations and enhance strategies for conserving, restoring, and managing marine ecosystems.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 79
University of California, Santa Barbara (US), Anheuser-Busch InBev (Belgium) (BE), University of Virginia (US), Flagler College (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Marine and coastal plant biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.