Characterization of PC-ABS and PETG Multi-Material Laminates Fabricated by MEX Method

Material-extrusion (MEX) printing with automated filament switching enables single-build multi-material laminates, but interfaces between dissimilar polymers may govern failure. Here, monolithic PETG, monolithic PC-ABS, and an alternating PETG/PC-ABS laminate (COMP) with 0.2 mm laminae (4 mm total) were fabricated and benchmarked. Tensile behavior was measured using ISO 527-2 Type 1B specimens at 5 and 50 mm/min, complemented by three-point bending in horizontal/vertical orientations, unnotched Charpy impact (ISO 179), Shore D hardness (ISO 868), and SEM fractography. COMP delivered the highest horizontal flexural strength (159.82 ± 25.42 MPa), exceeding both single-material baselines, indicating improved bending load capacity in the preferred orientation. In Charpy impact, COMP absorbed more energy than PETG in the horizontal condition (0.86 ± 0.14 J vs. 0.57 ± 0.06 J) but remained below PC-ABS. In tension, COMP strength decreased by ~21-23% relative to PETG and by ~5-6% relative to PC-ABS at both speeds, consistent with interface-controlled damage. SEM revealed void-assisted crack initiation and interfacial debonding aligned with raster paths, highlighting interfacial strengthening and porosity reduction as key routes to improve tensile performance while retaining favorable flexural and impact response.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Polymers
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/polym18060763
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characterization of PC-ABS and PETG Multi-Material Laminates Fabricated by MEX Method

Silvie Brožová, Ján Dižo, Marie Heliová, M. Ramasamy et al.
Polymers
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
article

Characterization of PC-ABS and PETG Multi-Material Laminates Fabricated by MEX Method

Silvie Brožová, Ján Dižo, Marie Heliová, M. Ramasamy, Ondřej Hilšer, Gražyna Simha Martynková, Aleš Slíva, Akash Nag, Quoc-Phu Ma
article en

Abstract

Material-extrusion (MEX) printing with automated filament switching enables single-build multi-material laminates, but interfaces between dissimilar polymers may govern failure. Here, monolithic PETG, monolithic PC-ABS, and an alternating PETG/PC-ABS laminate (COMP) with 0.2 mm laminae (4 mm total) were fabricated and benchmarked. Tensile behavior was measured using ISO 527-2 Type 1B specimens at 5 and 50 mm/min, complemented by three-point bending in horizontal/vertical orientations, unnotched Charpy impact (ISO 179), Shore D hardness (ISO 868), and SEM fractography. COMP delivered the highest horizontal flexural strength (159.82 ± 25.42 MPa), exceeding both single-material baselines, indicating improved bending load capacity in the preferred orientation. In Charpy impact, COMP absorbed more energy than PETG in the horizontal condition (0.86 ± 0.14 J vs. 0.57 ± 0.06 J) but remained below PC-ABS. In tension, COMP strength decreased by ~21-23% relative to PETG and by ~5-6% relative to PC-ABS at both speeds, consistent with interface-controlled damage. SEM revealed void-assisted crack initiation and interfacial debonding aligned with raster paths, highlighting interfacial strengthening and porosity reduction as key routes to improve tensile performance while retaining favorable flexural and impact response.

PolymersVol. 18(6)
VSB - Technical University of Ostrava (CZ), University of Žilina (SK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.