Evaluation of calibration accuracy in numerical simulation of laser powder bed fusion using a simplified thermomechanical model

Numerical simulations are essential in additive manufacturing for predicting distortions and stresses, thereby ensuring the reliability and performance of parts in industrial applications. However, traditional high-fidelity simulation methods often require significant computational resources. To overcome this limitation while maintaining accuracy, simplified approaches have been developed by incorporating experimental data through a preliminary calibration step. Nevertheless, certain variables involved in the calibration stage, specifically laser absorptivity and mesh size, can significantly influence both the accuracy and the efficiency of the simulation. This study investigates how these variables affect calibration accuracy using a simplified thermomechanical modeling approach. Simulations were performed and validated against experimental measurements. For this analysis, SS316L cantilever specimens oriented orthogonally were fabricated using the Laser Powder Bed Fusion process. The results indicated that lower laser absorptivity values led to better accuracy. Additionally, the model showed high sensitivity to mesh size, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate simulation parameters. Validation confirmed that the calibration errors aligned closely with simulation predictions. However, the results also suggested that the accuracy could be compromised with replication to a more complex geometry. These findings highlight the potential and limitations of this simplified approach for simulating large components and offer insights into how parameter selection affects model accuracy. Clarifying the assumptions of this model and explaining how the parameters influence its accuracy can be considered essential for future research aimed at improving this approach, as well as for supporting its dissemination in industrial applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2026.03.165
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of calibration accuracy in numerical simulation of laser powder bed fusion using a simplified thermomechanical model

Dan Alexander Gallego, Rodrigo Santiago Coelho, Lucas de Figueiredo Soares, Soeren Mueller
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Evaluation of calibration accuracy in numerical simulation of laser powder bed fusion using a simplified thermomechanical model

Dan Alexander Gallego, Rodrigo Santiago Coelho, Lucas de Figueiredo Soares, Soeren Mueller
article en

Abstract

Numerical simulations are essential in additive manufacturing for predicting distortions and stresses, thereby ensuring the reliability and performance of parts in industrial applications. However, traditional high-fidelity simulation methods often require significant computational resources. To overcome this limitation while maintaining accuracy, simplified approaches have been developed by incorporating experimental data through a preliminary calibration step. Nevertheless, certain variables involved in the calibration stage, specifically laser absorptivity and mesh size, can significantly influence both the accuracy and the efficiency of the simulation. This study investigates how these variables affect calibration accuracy using a simplified thermomechanical modeling approach. Simulations were performed and validated against experimental measurements. For this analysis, SS316L cantilever specimens oriented orthogonally were fabricated using the Laser Powder Bed Fusion process. The results indicated that lower laser absorptivity values led to better accuracy. Additionally, the model showed high sensitivity to mesh size, emphasizing the importance of selecting appropriate simulation parameters. Validation confirmed that the calibration errors aligned closely with simulation predictions. However, the results also suggested that the accuracy could be compromised with replication to a more complex geometry. These findings highlight the potential and limitations of this simplified approach for simulating large components and offer insights into how parameter selection affects model accuracy. Clarifying the assumptions of this model and explaining how the parameters influence its accuracy can be considered essential for future research aimed at improving this approach, as well as for supporting its dissemination in industrial applications.

Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyVol. 42
Serviço Nacional de Aprendizagem Industrial (BR), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.