Rethinking stakeholder engagement: A multidimensional framework inspired by meta-synthesis of food, energy, and water research

The benefits of involving stakeholders in natural resource projects are well established and in food-energy-water nexus work specifically, those benefits are increasingly being documented. We conducted a review of food, energy, water systems manuscripts and assessed whether stakeholders were engaged, when they were engaged, which stakeholders were involved, the level of their involvement, whether stakeholders' needs were considered, and whether stakeholder engagement was evaluated and monitored. Stakeholder engagement is effective when it is considered as an integrated process, but our review suggests that this is not common practice. We developed a framework for engaging stakeholders that includes six dimensions: 1. When should stakeholders be engaged? 2. Who should be engaged (identification and diversity)? 3. What role should stakeholders play? 4. How can researchers meet stakeholder needs? 5. What methods of engagement should be used? 6. How should researchers evaluate and monitor stakeholder engagement? We discuss the implications of adopting this framework for natural resource studies, including those focused on food-energy-water systems. • Stakeholder engagement is uncommon in FEWS research. • We describe if, how and when stakeholder engagement has been used in 483 FEWS papers. • We propose a conceptual framework for use in effectively engaging stakeholders.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Science & Policy
Published
2026-03-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2026.104353
Primary Topic
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Rethinking stakeholder engagement: A multidimensional framework inspired by meta-synthesis of food, energy, and water research

Paula Williams, Erin L. Cortus, Bassel Daher, Erich Seamon et al.
Environmental Science & Policy
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
article

Rethinking stakeholder engagement: A multidimensional framework inspired by meta-synthesis of food, energy, and water research

Paula Williams, Erin L. Cortus, Bassel Daher, Erich Seamon, Alyssa S. Thomas, Andrew Kliskey, J. Leah Jones-Crank
article en

Abstract

The benefits of involving stakeholders in natural resource projects are well established and in food-energy-water nexus work specifically, those benefits are increasingly being documented. We conducted a review of food, energy, water systems manuscripts and assessed whether stakeholders were engaged, when they were engaged, which stakeholders were involved, the level of their involvement, whether stakeholders' needs were considered, and whether stakeholder engagement was evaluated and monitored. Stakeholder engagement is effective when it is considered as an integrated process, but our review suggests that this is not common practice. We developed a framework for engaging stakeholders that includes six dimensions: 1. When should stakeholders be engaged? 2. Who should be engaged (identification and diversity)? 3. What role should stakeholders play? 4. How can researchers meet stakeholder needs? 5. What methods of engagement should be used? 6. How should researchers evaluate and monitor stakeholder engagement? We discuss the implications of adopting this framework for natural resource studies, including those focused on food-energy-water systems. • Stakeholder engagement is uncommon in FEWS research. • We describe if, how and when stakeholder engagement has been used in 483 FEWS papers. • We propose a conceptual framework for use in effectively engaging stakeholders.

Environmental Science & PolicyVol. 178
University of Minnesota (US), University of Waterloo (CA), University of Idaho (US), Baylor University (US), Thomas University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.