Keywords in Digital Humanities – A critical assessment of computational techniques for mapping security and freedom in historical debates

The article investigates the continued importance of keywords in digital humanities and especially their relation to recent machine-learning approaches. Different research practices related to digital humanities agree on the importance of keywords to present issues and/or provide the baseline for new stories about the past, about literature or media. Keywords are useful to target ideas that have no clear definitions and productive in describing contested categorisations that are key to humanities scholarship. At the same time, keywords are often employed used without considering specific contexts and how they are generated. To understand the diversity of keywords in digital humanities, we consider three approaches to computationally generating keywords, from traditional and established ones to state-of-the-art language modelling. With these three approaches, we analyse a case where keywords should be especially powerful, as underlying considerations are uncertain. We cover the relation between security, human-rights and freedom according to discussions in United Nations documents. Finally, we present a number of approaches to productively use keywords to tell a different story about the relation of security and freedom according to UN discussions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital humanities quarterly
Published
2025-10-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63744/3gct5wexdcgu
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Keywords in Digital Humanities – A critical assessment of computational techniques for mapping security and freedom in historical debates

Tobias Blanke, Chloe Papadopoulou
Digital humanities quarterly
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Keywords in Digital Humanities – A critical assessment of computational techniques for mapping security and freedom in historical debates

Tobias Blanke, Chloe Papadopoulou
article en

Abstract

The article investigates the continued importance of keywords in digital humanities and especially their relation to recent machine-learning approaches. Different research practices related to digital humanities agree on the importance of keywords to present issues and/or provide the baseline for new stories about the past, about literature or media. Keywords are useful to target ideas that have no clear definitions and productive in describing contested categorisations that are key to humanities scholarship. At the same time, keywords are often employed used without considering specific contexts and how they are generated. To understand the diversity of keywords in digital humanities, we consider three approaches to computationally generating keywords, from traditional and established ones to state-of-the-art language modelling. With these three approaches, we analyse a case where keywords should be especially powerful, as underlying considerations are uncertain. We cover the relation between security, human-rights and freedom according to discussions in United Nations documents. Finally, we present a number of approaches to productively use keywords to tell a different story about the relation of security and freedom according to UN discussions.

Digital humanities quarterlyVol. 19(3)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Keywords in Digital Humanities – A critical assessment of computational techniques for mapping security and freedom in historical debates — Tobias Blanke, Chloe Papadopoulou · Digital humanities quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS