Counting Feeling: Affect Theory and Sentiment Analysis in TextBlob

Sentiment analysis encompasses a range of computational techniques for detecting and quantifying the presence of affect and emotion in written texts. In this essay, I use the techniques of critical code studies to offer a case study of one such sentiment analysis tool called TextBlob, about which I advance two intertwined claims. First, I map TextBlob’s reliance on a web of programmatic and textual dependencies, and how in turn, TextBlob effaces these dependencies’ formal specificity in the service of computational processing. This effacement supports my second claim: that TextBlob, and sentiment analysis more generally, models affect as programmatically latent in the smallest particles of language, which it then seeks to make available for computational processing. I explore the consequences of this computational model of affect for digital humanists seeking to integrate sentiment analysis and similar tools (including AI/LLMs) into their work.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital humanities quarterly
Published
2026-03-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63744/7gengas6hkcz
Primary Topic
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counting Feeling: Affect Theory and Sentiment Analysis in TextBlob

Jeffrey Moro
Digital humanities quarterly
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
article

Counting Feeling: Affect Theory and Sentiment Analysis in TextBlob

Jeffrey Moro
article en

Abstract

Sentiment analysis encompasses a range of computational techniques for detecting and quantifying the presence of affect and emotion in written texts. In this essay, I use the techniques of critical code studies to offer a case study of one such sentiment analysis tool called TextBlob, about which I advance two intertwined claims. First, I map TextBlob’s reliance on a web of programmatic and textual dependencies, and how in turn, TextBlob effaces these dependencies’ formal specificity in the service of computational processing. This effacement supports my second claim: that TextBlob, and sentiment analysis more generally, models affect as programmatically latent in the smallest particles of language, which it then seeks to make available for computational processing. I explore the consequences of this computational model of affect for digital humanists seeking to integrate sentiment analysis and similar tools (including AI/LLMs) into their work.

Digital humanities quarterlyVol. 20(1)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.