THE STRATEGIC EDGE: EXAMINING GENERIC STRATEGY MEDIATION IN ZAMBIAN UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE

Higher Education Institutions have joined the corporate world in adopting strategies in order to enhance their performance. This study sought to explore the mediating effect of Porter’s generic strategies on the relationship between internal resources and university performance in Zambia. The target population was 499 students from 4 universities. Data was collected via self-administered questionnaires. The study used SPSS version 27 and PROCESS macro version 4.2 to analyze data. The results indicate that differentiation strategy has both a direct and an indirect effect on university performance, while focus strategy has a limited indirect effect on university performance. The study also reveals that cost leadership has no effect direct or indirect on university performance. The implications of the study are that universities should embrace differentiation and focus strategies in their planning to enhance their performance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19133641
Primary Topic
Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE STRATEGIC EDGE: EXAMINING GENERIC STRATEGY MEDIATION IN ZAMBIAN UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE

Mwansa Tembo Chileshe
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
article

THE STRATEGIC EDGE: EXAMINING GENERIC STRATEGY MEDIATION IN ZAMBIAN UNIVERSITY PERFORMANCE

Mwansa Tembo Chileshe
article en

Abstract

Higher Education Institutions have joined the corporate world in adopting strategies in order to enhance their performance. This study sought to explore the mediating effect of Porter’s generic strategies on the relationship between internal resources and university performance in Zambia. The target population was 499 students from 4 universities. Data was collected via self-administered questionnaires. The study used SPSS version 27 and PROCESS macro version 4.2 to analyze data. The results indicate that differentiation strategy has both a direct and an indirect effect on university performance, while focus strategy has a limited indirect effect on university performance. The study also reveals that cost leadership has no effect direct or indirect on university performance. The implications of the study are that universities should embrace differentiation and focus strategies in their planning to enhance their performance

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Zambia (ZM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Organizational Leadership and Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.