The Cicada’s Deafening Tymbals

Abstract In the genealogy of sound studies, the figures of Pierre Schaeffer and R. Murray Schafer have loomed large, the former bequeathing key concepts of sound objects and acousmatic listening, the latter the idea of soundscapes. Relatively neglected have been Schaeffer’s elaboration of sonic morphology and typology, as well as Schafer’s ecological impetus. This essay returns to and links these aspects of these writers’ works, focusing on the troubling example in poetry, sound description, and first-wave sonic ecology of the “song” of the cicada to suggest how a more critical sonic ecology might be forged—one that extends what is useful in their contributions but does not rely on the implicit embraces of purity hidden in the valuation of reduced listening (Schaeffer) and the mystical praise of silence (Schafer) and that instead makes explicit the noisy grounds of auditory dissensus and the limitations of anthropocentric listening.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Qui Parle
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/10418385-11997989
Primary Topic
Sound Studies and Aurality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Cicada’s Deafening Tymbals

James A. Steintrager
Qui Parle
Sound Studies and Aurality
article

The Cicada’s Deafening Tymbals

James A. Steintrager
article en

Abstract

Abstract In the genealogy of sound studies, the figures of Pierre Schaeffer and R. Murray Schafer have loomed large, the former bequeathing key concepts of sound objects and acousmatic listening, the latter the idea of soundscapes. Relatively neglected have been Schaeffer’s elaboration of sonic morphology and typology, as well as Schafer’s ecological impetus. This essay returns to and links these aspects of these writers’ works, focusing on the troubling example in poetry, sound description, and first-wave sonic ecology of the “song” of the cicada to suggest how a more critical sonic ecology might be forged—one that extends what is useful in their contributions but does not rely on the implicit embraces of purity hidden in the valuation of reduced listening (Schaeffer) and the mystical praise of silence (Schafer) and that instead makes explicit the noisy grounds of auditory dissensus and the limitations of anthropocentric listening.

Qui ParleVol. 34(2)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Sound Studies and Aurality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.