Configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice and Theological Framing in Predicting Inclusive Disability Perception: The Haryono 2³ Theological-Configurational Model

This working paper develops and tests a configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice (KAP) model integrated with theological framing to predict inclusive disability perception within congregational contexts. Employing a Haryono 2³ factorial design and binary logistic regression, the study analyzes how three dichotomized predictors—Knowledge (K), Attitude (A), and Practice (P)—generate eight congregational profiles that correspond to probabilistic differences in inclusive perception. The findings suggest that practical engagement alone does not guarantee inclusive theological transformation; rather, knowledge operates as a catalytic moderating variable. The study contributes to empirical theology, disability studies, and congregational research by operationalizing theological constructs within a quantitative predictive framework.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19124075
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice and Theological Framing in Predicting Inclusive Disability Perception: The Haryono 2³ Theological-Configurational Model

Haryono Saputro
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice and Theological Framing in Predicting Inclusive Disability Perception: The Haryono 2³ Theological-Configurational Model

Haryono Saputro
article en

Abstract

This working paper develops and tests a configurational Knowledge–Attitude–Practice (KAP) model integrated with theological framing to predict inclusive disability perception within congregational contexts. Employing a Haryono 2³ factorial design and binary logistic regression, the study analyzes how three dichotomized predictors—Knowledge (K), Attitude (A), and Practice (P)—generate eight congregational profiles that correspond to probabilistic differences in inclusive perception. The findings suggest that practical engagement alone does not guarantee inclusive theological transformation; rather, knowledge operates as a catalytic moderating variable. The study contributes to empirical theology, disability studies, and congregational research by operationalizing theological constructs within a quantitative predictive framework.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.