Debates in #BlackDH: Key Moments and Queer Directions in Black Studies Scholarship

Historically, the study of the digital has been an amorphous undertaking, spanning multiple fields and disciplines and positioning the digital as a democratic space open to multiple communities and perspectives. Despite this ideology, scholarship, including research on #transformDH to #BlackDH, has demonstrated the need for greater diversity, equity, and inclusion within the digital humanities. Specifically, these hashtags have been used to curate diverse scholarship while demonstrating the need to create a scholarship that focuses on an intersectional understanding of the digital humanities. By drawing on the histories of research and researchers both within and outside of Black studies, this article will illuminate the means and methods of producing scholarship at this critical intersection while speaking to the need for greater inclusion of Black feminist, queer, and justice-oriented perspectives. Pushing back against the impetus to add identity to the title of a field or framework in name but not practice, this article refines the histories and contributions of multiple disciplines and standpoints that should be included and credited when defining the Black in Black digital humanities. Whether sparking hashtag activism and crowdsourcing digital labor to developing new terminology and fields, Black digital humanities draws on and develops work that is already critically engaged with the intersection of identity and digital studies in theory and praxis. By focusing on the development of the Black digital humanities and its defining characteristics, this article will also articulate how the nexus of digital research, activism, and pedagogy offers key interventions and new directions for both Black studies and the digital humanities.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital humanities quarterly
Published
2024-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63744/vvxtf7f4cxay
Primary Topic
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Debates in #BlackDH: Key Moments and Queer Directions in Black Studies Scholarship

Faithe J. Day
Digital humanities quarterly
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
article

Debates in #BlackDH: Key Moments and Queer Directions in Black Studies Scholarship

Faithe J. Day
article en

Abstract

Historically, the study of the digital has been an amorphous undertaking, spanning multiple fields and disciplines and positioning the digital as a democratic space open to multiple communities and perspectives. Despite this ideology, scholarship, including research on #transformDH to #BlackDH, has demonstrated the need for greater diversity, equity, and inclusion within the digital humanities. Specifically, these hashtags have been used to curate diverse scholarship while demonstrating the need to create a scholarship that focuses on an intersectional understanding of the digital humanities. By drawing on the histories of research and researchers both within and outside of Black studies, this article will illuminate the means and methods of producing scholarship at this critical intersection while speaking to the need for greater inclusion of Black feminist, queer, and justice-oriented perspectives. Pushing back against the impetus to add identity to the title of a field or framework in name but not practice, this article refines the histories and contributions of multiple disciplines and standpoints that should be included and credited when defining the Black in Black digital humanities. Whether sparking hashtag activism and crowdsourcing digital labor to developing new terminology and fields, Black digital humanities draws on and develops work that is already critically engaged with the intersection of identity and digital studies in theory and praxis. By focusing on the development of the Black digital humanities and its defining characteristics, this article will also articulate how the nexus of digital research, activism, and pedagogy offers key interventions and new directions for both Black studies and the digital humanities.

Digital humanities quarterlyVol. 18(4)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Digital Humanities and Scholarship
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.