The edge is already there: Experimental insights into the origins of stone tool technology

• Natural edges may have served as precursors to manufactured sharp edges. • Free-hand percussion required incremental technical advancements to emerge. • Early stone tool making may have required instruction or guidance. The origins of stone tool technology remain a subject of ongoing debate. To investigate the early stages of this technological evolution, we conducted an experiment examining how naïve contemporary humans approached the task of cutting rope in a quasi-realistic setting where natural materials—such as boulders, cobbles, nodules, and seashells —were readily available. The study began with the assumption that participants would devise ways to create sharp-edged tools. However, the results revealed a consistent tendency to rely on naturally occurring sharp edges. These findings support the notion that early hominins may have initially exploited such naturally available edges before progressing to deliberate tool manufacture. When participants were explicitly instructed to produce sharp edges, they employed techniques of bipolar, throwing, and anvil percussion; none attempted freehand percussion. This observation reinforces the idea that freehand flaking required incremental technical advancements before it could emerge as part of early lithic technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2026.105706
Primary Topic
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The edge is already there: Experimental insights into the origins of stone tool technology

Somaye Khaksar, Jennifer C. French, Reza Modarres, Agustin Fuentes et al.
Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
article

The edge is already there: Experimental insights into the origins of stone tool technology

Somaye Khaksar, Jennifer C. French, Reza Modarres, Agustin Fuentes, Marc Kissel
article en

Abstract

• Natural edges may have served as precursors to manufactured sharp edges. • Free-hand percussion required incremental technical advancements to emerge. • Early stone tool making may have required instruction or guidance. The origins of stone tool technology remain a subject of ongoing debate. To investigate the early stages of this technological evolution, we conducted an experiment examining how naïve contemporary humans approached the task of cutting rope in a quasi-realistic setting where natural materials—such as boulders, cobbles, nodules, and seashells —were readily available. The study began with the assumption that participants would devise ways to create sharp-edged tools. However, the results revealed a consistent tendency to rely on naturally occurring sharp edges. These findings support the notion that early hominins may have initially exploited such naturally available edges before progressing to deliberate tool manufacture. When participants were explicitly instructed to produce sharp edges, they employed techniques of bipolar, throwing, and anvil percussion; none attempted freehand percussion. This observation reinforces the idea that freehand flaking required incremental technical advancements before it could emerge as part of early lithic technology.

Journal of Archaeological Science ReportsVol. 71
University of Liverpool (GB), George Washington University (US), Princeton University (US), Appalachian State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.