Disentangling Ownership in Digital Collecting Practices: Approaches From Across Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums

This article examines approaches to digital collecting across galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAMs) in order to scrutinize established norms regarding the ownership of collections. Challenges to collecting institutions have been particularly apparent in the context of digital heritage, which encompasses a range of activities including digitization, born-digital collecting, aggregation, and collecting from social media. Digital collections can unsettle collections management processes that assume the retention and control of static holdings, due to their reproducibility, proprietary frameworks, and complex rights issues. Using case studies drawn from across different GLAMs, the article identifies three modes of digital collecting: ownership-led, ambiguous ownership, and shared ownership. These three modes demonstrate ways in which institutional ownership claims affect the status of digital collections. The article argues for the need to practice approaches to ownership that offer more productive means of navigating the complexities of digital collecting, thus preserving a fuller sense of what digital collections are.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Digital humanities quarterly
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63744/3f9pjv5r6aux
Primary Topic
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disentangling Ownership in Digital Collecting Practices: Approaches From Across Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums

Elizabeth Stainforth, Arran J. Rees
Digital humanities quarterly
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
article

Disentangling Ownership in Digital Collecting Practices: Approaches From Across Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums

Elizabeth Stainforth, Arran J. Rees
article en

Abstract

This article examines approaches to digital collecting across galleries, libraries, archives, and museums (GLAMs) in order to scrutinize established norms regarding the ownership of collections. Challenges to collecting institutions have been particularly apparent in the context of digital heritage, which encompasses a range of activities including digitization, born-digital collecting, aggregation, and collecting from social media. Digital collections can unsettle collections management processes that assume the retention and control of static holdings, due to their reproducibility, proprietary frameworks, and complex rights issues. Using case studies drawn from across different GLAMs, the article identifies three modes of digital collecting: ownership-led, ambiguous ownership, and shared ownership. These three modes demonstrate ways in which institutional ownership claims affect the status of digital collections. The article argues for the need to practice approaches to ownership that offer more productive means of navigating the complexities of digital collecting, thus preserving a fuller sense of what digital collections are.

Digital humanities quarterlyVol. 19(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital and Traditional Archives Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Disentangling Ownership in Digital Collecting Practices: Approaches From Across Galleries, Libraries, Archives, and Museums — Elizabeth Stainforth, Arran J. Rees · Digital humanities quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS