Being in Work

In this paper, we carve out “being in work” as people’s desire and effort to habituate themselves in experiences of work. We do so from the unusual angle of two disabled persons, Bibek and Neema, who struggle for work in Nepal and Tanzania. Drawing on disability anthropology and the anthropology of work, we show how our interlocutors circumstantially emphasize different ways to be in work and engage in activities that broaden the horizons of what counts as proper work. These efforts are interrupted by the closure of projects, declining health, environmental disasters, accidents, economic crises, and the effects of a pandemic. What concerns us here is how Neema and Bibek maintain a place in work across these circumstances by exploiting the malleability of different features of work, such as activities, compensations, place and time, skill sets, equipment, or work-related ethos. Our insights redirect focus from structures of exclusion and the negative appeal of “precarious labor” toward exploring people’s ongoing efforts to belong and feel normal through work. In the Global South (and elsewhere), finding decent work is equally desired by nondisabled populations, which renders disability a privileged position from which to explore matters of occupational existence and circumstantial disablement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Current Anthropology
Published
2026-03-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/740874
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Being in Work

Giorgio Brocco, Stefanie Mauksch
Current Anthropology
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Being in Work

Giorgio Brocco, Stefanie Mauksch
article en

Abstract

In this paper, we carve out “being in work” as people’s desire and effort to habituate themselves in experiences of work. We do so from the unusual angle of two disabled persons, Bibek and Neema, who struggle for work in Nepal and Tanzania. Drawing on disability anthropology and the anthropology of work, we show how our interlocutors circumstantially emphasize different ways to be in work and engage in activities that broaden the horizons of what counts as proper work. These efforts are interrupted by the closure of projects, declining health, environmental disasters, accidents, economic crises, and the effects of a pandemic. What concerns us here is how Neema and Bibek maintain a place in work across these circumstances by exploiting the malleability of different features of work, such as activities, compensations, place and time, skill sets, equipment, or work-related ethos. Our insights redirect focus from structures of exclusion and the negative appeal of “precarious labor” toward exploring people’s ongoing efforts to belong and feel normal through work. In the Global South (and elsewhere), finding decent work is equally desired by nondisabled populations, which renders disability a privileged position from which to explore matters of occupational existence and circumstantial disablement.

Current Anthropology
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.